The chiefs of Rugby admitted in Ski News, their sport is not “incredibly safe” due to “high risk”, although insistenting players to encourage priority for concerns for the needs for earthquake concerns.
Candras at the dangers of the main collisions comes in front of the Women’s World Cup rugby starting in Sunderland next week.
At that tournament, for the first time at the World Cup, smart mouth flash fles red if they detect potential shocking needs for which further assessment of force measurement and movement from the influence on the head.
“We could find a head in the sand and pretend something doesn’t exist, but it won’t help anyone,” said World Rugby Science and Medical Manager Dr Lindsai Starling Ski News.
“It’s a sport that has a high risk of injuries and it comes from the physical contact nature of the game, which is also what we all love to watch it. And it cannot be ignored.
“We can’t pretend that sports is incredibly safe and there is no risk of injury. And so by creating more awareness when it was a significant head, it is important to educate people.”
There is an expectation that one player per match can be removed due to potential head injuries at the World Cup, which opens in England in Sunderland next Friday.
The players would then leave the field for the evaluation of the head injury. Then analyzes the recording to see the permanent players after influence.
Then a series of questions for testing memory and concentration would be set. The players are asked to remember the word from the list read and repeat the numbers in different order.
Critical time for rugby
The Rugby is so honest of the potential risks of major injuries, as a sport, the legal action of more than 700 people claim that leaders claim that they are carelessly to take reasonable actions to protect them from brain injuries.
The case progresses slowly with the challenges, including about the historical medical documentation.
“The move is obviously incredibly serious,” Dr. Starling said in the English team in Twickenham.
“It is absolutely our priority number one in terms of understanding why they happen and do what we can reduce it.
“The other side of that argument, however, is that we know this information. It would be more frightening or more worries that we didn’t know that.”
The World Rugby believes that women’s players are more susceptible to be overcome from their men’s colleagues, but on “much lower magnitudes”.
Still explore why. This could be a consequence of physical differences in the strength in the neck and metabolic footsteps, or could be combined with women’s players that later access more technical training.
The parent’s side on a woman’s game
But how is the spectrum of the brain hurt with the World Cup Mission to super-fill a woman’s game in England, expanding the audience and encourage young people to play?
Especially with those blinking the routing fall into potential shooting needs.
Dr. Starling admits that this creates concern. But parents who suspect whether their children should take rugby, there is an attempt to offer some assurances from those monitoring security, citing improved technology.
“We’ve never been in a situation where we know more about what risk,” said the World Rugby Service Dr. Eanna Falvey said Ski News.
“It will improve this over time, so our business is to give parents autonomy to make a decision that I can play their daughter.
Ferrocity in the heart of Rugby
“If their daughter wants to play, we want to help them get to the decision that they are satisfied with the level of exposure that daughter has and what they can do about it.
“There are a lot of health hazards not to get involved in sports. Physical inactivity is the greatest health care in the western world.
“So to be involved in team sports has huge benefits.”
And Prof Falvey stressed the essence of the rugby, sometimes, ferrocity.
“It’s a contact sport,” he said. “Nobody scales from that fact. I think people playing play play because they want to play contact sports. Our job is that this game is as safe as it.”