One day after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) board approved a resolution, Israel launched an unprecedented end on June 13 on Iran’s military and nuclear site. Tehran nucleus was not following your commitment to the safety gardens??
Although Israel did not use the UN Nuclear Watchdog resolution to prove the Justification of the Iranian attack, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs welcomed the IAEA’s resolution and called it “a required and outstanding step” which confirmed Iran’s “systematic hidden nuclear weapons.”
The Iranian Foreign Ministry and the Atomic Energy Association condemned the resolution in a joint statement and called it “politically motivated.” The joint statement states that “IAEA’s credibility and integrity seriously underlines”.
Tehran insists that its nuclear program is for civil purposes, and its facilities are examined by UN Nuclear Watchdog.
Here is what the IAEA said about the Iranian nuclear program at the beginning of this month and the criticism of its previous actions.
IAEA thought that Iran was building nuclear weapons?
IAEA could not fully evaluate Iran’s nuclear power programs, as Tehran stopped the implementation of additional protocols on February 7, which allowed the IAA enhanced inspection rights, including SNAP inspection and continuous surveillance.
Iran continued to follow the IAEA’s unanimous Safegard agreement after 2, who allowed Iran to enter the declared atomic sites (Natanz, Fordo, Bush) and allowed regular monitoring and verification of the declared nuclear content.
At a press event in June June on June, IAEA Director General Rafael Groosi said that Iran has recently failed to comply with the failure to comply with “significant decline in verifying whether Iran’s nuclear program was completely quiet.”
During the meeting of the IAEA Governor’s Board (which happened from June 9-13), Iran said that Iran did not repeat the questions of the agency in the presence of man-made uranium particles in three places-Waramin, Marivan and Tirkezabad.
Grocery describes Iran’s “rapid accumulation of very rich uranium”. Fordo and Natzaz??
In 2023, IAEA found 83.7 percent pure uranium particles Fordo – 90 % of the nuclear bombs are needed to make up.
Iran’s nuclear facilities on the EAEA Board on June 12 a day before the Israeli attack A resolution passed Tehran is announcing his non-inconsistent responsibilities.
Hashim Ahilbara, reported from Vienna on June 7, was mentioned for the first time in about 3 years by the Hashim Ahilbara of the Iran nuclear system.
Last week, Gori emphasized that the IAEA did not find any evidence of the production of Iranian nuclear weapons.
One in Al Jazir’s interview On June 2, on June 2, Groosy strongly stated that Iran did not conclude that the bomb was building a bomb because Iran violated his promises.
He said, “As an observer, we have not seen the factors of permission to confirm that there is a nuclear weapon that is being produced or production somewhere in Iran.”
US Vice President JD Vans requested the IAEA resolution to prosecute Iran’s military action.
“They have found their non-existence of their non-existence of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAA), which rarely is a right organization,” he posted on June 2 June on X X.
On June 7, the US President ordered a bomb on three Iranian sites in Iran – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu welcomed him. Iran has claimed for decades of nuclear weapons.
Trump claims that nuclear sites have been “destroyed, and the Iran’s nuclear program has been kept back for decades.
How did Iran respond?
On June 23, the National National Committee of Iran’s Parliamentary Committee approved the bill prepared to suspend cooperation with Tehran’s nuclear watchdog, a committee spokesman Ibrahim Razai told Taswim News Agency.
Razai said that it would be suspended until the bill is guaranteed to be installed on the bill, permission to inspect, and submit a report to the IAEA. Iran joined the IAEA in 1959 in.
Specifically, Razai said that Iran has claimed the Signature of the UN’s nuclear-exposed agreement (NPT) 968.68.
Parliament will still have to approve the bill to withdraw the NPT.
Tehran has long reported that the deal has failed to defend a wide range of nuclear weapons, the United States and Israel.
What is more, the Iranian authorities have claimed that the next secretary of Grocery UN is planning to become a numerous secretary, and therefore the Western supporter is abandoning the integrity of the nuclear watchdog by accepting the rhetoric for personal adaptation.
On June 7, Mohammad Islami, head of Iran’s nuclear power association, told state TV: “Rafael Groosi (IS) is trying to get his ambition to become the secretary of his ambition and the UN Secretary, and his goals will align himself.”
Fukushima disaster had an IAEA skirt debate?
On June 223, the Japanese government began to release water, but still radioactive, water treated by Fukushima Dye, which was destroyed in the Pacific Ocean.
The IAEA gave a green light to the controversial plan after a two -year review.
At that time, Groosi said the security review of the agency had concluded that the plan was “compatible with the related international security standards… (and) the control of water treated at the sea, gradually people of discharge and the atmosphere have a negative radiological effect.”
More than 1.3 million tonnes of water was built in the Fukushima plant from A March 3 Tsunami Electricity and cooling system destroyed the power station and driven it The worst molecule of the world from Chorobil??
Japan’s neighbors and intense resistance were encountered in the light of water launched in August 2023 Pacific Island Nations As well as fishing and farming Fukushima and the surrounding communityThose who are afraid of their livelihood.
Beijing, especially was a strict critic of the water discharge plan. In a statement to the IAEA’s July 223, the Chinese Foreign Ministry disciplined the “hurry” and claimed that “the opinion of the expert failed to completely reflect.”
Is Iraq’s echo in the current discussion about Iran?
To many observers, there are.
On the front of the US Iraq, the US and the United Kingdom, on the forefront of the 2003 US Iraq, asserted that Iraq has a large number of destruction (WMD) weapons with chemical weapons in addition to the pursuit of nuclear weapons.
According to the argument that Iraq had raised a risk for regional and global security, these claims were at the center to prove the justification of military action.
At the end of the 9th, the IAA conducted several inspections of the Iraqi weapons programs.
At the beginning of 2003, they established the existence of a high-tolerance aluminum tube in Iraq. In theory, it can be used to enrich uranium for use in nuclear warheads.
In the Iraq order of the Bush administration, aluminum tubes became corrosive. As the only physical evidence to brandish the United States, President George W Bush and his advisors reliable to APOCalyptic images requested.
US National Security Advisor Condoliza Rice explained on CNN on September 8, 2002. “We do not want to be a smoker gun mushroom cloud.
For its part, the IAEA denied the theory that the tube was fixed in the nuclear program. And after the attack, no active WMD programs were found in Iraq in wide discovery.
