What are Trump’s options to deal with Iran?

President Trump’s comments in Israel-Iran configuration puts from the full support for the coming of Israel to have strong surroundings from them, and return.

His ambiguity increased in uncertainty while fighting himself increased.

While the Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu said attacks “fully engaged” in the US.

So what factors do Trump weight and, to heal, what are his choices now?

As the Missiles of Israel hit Tehran on Thursday, Trump threatened Iran leaders with “more violent” attack from his Israeli armed bombs.

We know Trump’s ultimate goal. He said, like Netanyyahu, that Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb. Inexpensive, he said his desired choice (unlike Netanyahu) through an agreement between the US and Iran (this route also shows his described world owner).

But there is an equivalent of his arrival there, sometimes lean on the threat of force, other times to push diplomacy. Last week he also told the same breath that an Israeli attack of Iran helps an agreement or it “blow it”.

His disrespect is sometimes shown by his supporters after the fact as strategic – the so-called “Madman” theory of foreign relations. This theory is the one who used to describe Trump’s negotiation tactics and suggested intentionally with no doubt of enemies (or even allies in Trump) following. It is famous to be dedicated to some of President Richard Nixon’s Cold War Statuce.

Some of the Trump advisors and support the “maximum pressure” part of Madman’s theory when it goes to his way to Iran. They think the threats last last because, they argue, Iran is not serious about negotiating Obama nuclear signed later.

Netanyahu has applied to regular Trump pressure to go down the military diplomatic road, and the US president – May eventually see his greater threatening Tehran’s leadership

Israel also can also be pushed to behind the scenes for the American involvement in, as it sees, to complete the job. US has bunter buster bomber bomber who believes in Israel can destroy Iran in uranium development of Uranium in Iran.

As the fight increases, so is the pressure of Trump from the Hawkish Camp of Republicans in Congress that has long called the Iranian regime change.

Trump also see the argument that it will force the iranians to negotiate with him with a weak hand. But the truth remains that the Iranians are on that table, as the sixth round of talks due to Envoy Steve Steve Witkoff planned in Oman.

Talks have been left.

So far, Trump explained that the US was not involved in the attack of Israel.

Multiply comes with significant and potential risks of determining for Trump. The American Naval Ralaglager and Ground Sics Missile Batteries helped Israel’s defense against the reciprocal of Iranian.

Some of the Trump advisers at the National Security Council are likely to impose against him that do anything that adds to Israel’s attacks in the immediate days of Israel’s deserts.

Netanyahu now argues that the target of the Supreme Leader of Iran Ali Khamenei finish, does not waste, the conflict.

But an unknown US officer is shortened by some weekends during the weekend Trump explains that he is opposed to such a step.

One of the major political reasons playing Trump’s mind is his home support.

Most of the Republicans of Congress warned Israel, including continuing American weapons in the country. Many support Israeli attacks in Iran.

But there are key voices within Trump’s that America is good again (swollen) movement that is currently incorrectly rejected this support of traditional “Ironclad” for Israel.

Within the last days they asked why the US was at risk of being attracted to a War East given “America” ​​America to Frump.

The Pro-Trump Journalist Tucker Carlson wrote a suspicious criticism On Friday said administration claims unreal, and that the US must “throw Israel”.

He suggests Mr. Netanyahu “and the government hungry” works in a way to drag Tropang Tropang US to fight for his name.

Carlson wrote:

Similarly, the strong Trumpist Loyalist US Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene Posted in x That: “Anyone who boasts for the US that can be fully involved in the Israeli / Iran war not first in America / Maga”.

This represents a great eases for Trump.

It increased his pressure to put the distance between the US and the offensive of Israel and had signs, publicly in the least, he responded.

The weekend’s debate join him with social media that he joined the Russian president to call an end to the war. When he said Iran and Israel must make a deal, add: “The US has nothing to do with the attack of Iran”.

Iran has threatened to attack US bases in the region if, as the Washington had occurred in Israel’s defense.

The Risk of any American casualties would probably see the maga isolationist argument growth Exponentially, in turn potential adding pressure on Trump to pull back and urge Mr Netanyahu to bring the offensive to a swifter end.