Security security, BBC news
EPAWhatever words are used to make plans that arise from Sunday summit of 19 main European leaders in London – stop or plans in peace are greater.
The Prime Minister of the UK Keir Starmer, with the French President Emmanuel Macron, hope it is the plan to bring the final peace to Ukraine.
In its heart lies what Sir Keir called on “The coalition is ready”Those who help to guarantee peace once an agreement can be reached.
But what are the weeds – and how easy they can be overcome?
Can Europe be united with a sufficient impairment force?
First, can European armies and half without arsenals in pairs in any way of a large force of Ukraine’s control? What countries, except UK and France, are willing to send forces such as uncertain scenario given to doubts in US support?
Ukrainian president Voltodmyr Zelensky says it must be an international force of up to 200,000 troops To maintain a ceasefire at 600 mil (960km) contact line between two opposing armies, Russia and Ukraine.
Although that number is depressed, the Ukrainian leader is correct to evaluate how much it takes to act as an adequate constraint of any future incurs in Russia.
Indeed, Europe would struggle to arrive at least the third of that number, so the effect of decades running into the militaries, after dividing peace to the post-colld war peace dividend.
The power of air is important. It is the same for the Knowing ISR (intelligence, monitoring and revision) and for the dispute of any future incurs in Russia.
There is no point with a brigade of UK troops who are seated in the word stop when Russian soldiers and armed vehicles have been poured into 100 miles.
The US has a great capability to signs of intelligence, prompting, as well as air-to-air refueling, without a strong European force to fight. A recent report by London-based tank The International Institute for International Activity (IISS) says:
“European trust in Washington’s military capabilities, especially critical prompts such as ISR and air-to-air refueling, a major challenge without great investments in places.”
Keeps saying that: “The US also contributes to half of the plane of NATO and Fighter Ground attack.”
In light, joining a reliable force of control to protect Ukraine is more challenging, if not impossible, without US military backup.
Can Trump attract to give a US backstop?
Donald Trump wants to say that he doesn’t start wars, he stops them.
The last thing he wants to do today is to make US combat troops and air power to an unstable ceaseline with shooting forces.
Instead, he rebuked his desired way to end this war, which Cut an agreement directly to the Russian President Vladimir Putinone-to-one.
Sir Keir’s goal is to come to Europe with a reliable proposal to stop stops can then present President Trump – and I agree to agree A US Military Military Backstop.
So far, that’s not likely.
Will Russia accept it?
RabauseWhy is it on earth? – some reason.
The forces of land wins the battle, despite a terrible cost of human life and Ukraine has all the ally in this war: the US.
Without American military support, Ukraine is hard to continue to prevent the invasion of Russian troops in the east and south-east. If we don’t have Patriot socks, its cities are more vulnerable to missile attacks in Russia’s missile.
President Putin often explained that he could not receive the presence of NATO members of the NATO in Ukraine. Now that he is effective with the White House allyHe does not give this point at this point unless President Trump can give him a great infection instead.
The extremity of all is that the Kremlin has not stopped at its maximum intention for Ukraine to bring across the country, replaced Zelensky in a poy, pro-Russian puppet.
To the minimum naked, it is unlikely to act the main request that Ukraine is permanently leading the territories of Kherson, also forced thousands of Ukrainizhzhia, also forced the adjacent towns of Kherson, who also forced the people who were also forced by the Kherson towns. taga-Dones, ug gipugos ang gatusan nga mga nasud nga taga-Donets, nga gipugos usab sa mga taga-Donton, nga gipugos ang gatusan nga mga residente sa Ukraine, nga gipugos usab ang mga tawo nga mga residente sa Farsia, nga gipugos usab ang mga libong mga residente sa Ukraine, ug gipugos ang gatusan nga mga residente sa Ukraine, nga gipugos ang gatusan nga mga residente sa Ukraine, nga gipugos usab ang mga tawo nga taga-Donas, nga also pressed people who mainly in Kherson towns


