In 2016, Donald Trump called the invasion of Iraq a “great error”, the result of a deliberate act of deceit by intelligence in the US intelligence.
“They lie!” He said during a Republican Primary debate in February of that year. “They say there are weapons of mass destruction. None. No. And they know nothing.”
Today Trump is in the White House, with a weighted military intervention in a WAR with parallel ereie with operation in Iraqi – a campaign he says a waste of $ 2tn.
After now, the reason for war is to stop a country to get Nuclear weapons And so remove an existing threat to one of America’s closest allies.
Then, as now, some port hesitates that WMD threat is true.
“Intelligence suggests that even Iran has a nuclear program, they do not seek the weapon,” says Rosemary Kelanic, director of defense defense priorities.
Others went again. Tucker Carlson, the media personality that opposes any US participation in another Middle East War, which Iran is a “false” to the long-term revolutionary regime revolutionary change in Tehran.
“Indeed, there is zero reliable intelligence that suggests Iran wherever they are expected to build a bomb, or have plans to Iran from a nuclear weapon.”
Battlefield critics discussed the newest annual assessment of US intelligence in Congress in National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard – a Democratic and doubtful of military interference.
While recognizing that the stockpile of Iran the uranium is at its highest level, he insists Tehran without building a atomic bomb.
But Trump expelled the assessment. “I didn’t care about what he said,” he said Tuesday when asked about Gabbard’s view. As far as he or she is concerned, Iran is “very close” with a nuclear weapon.
Trump is not only doubtful to asserbar 2025 threats to the threat. “Fool it is not,” said Elliott Abrams, a foreign Hawk policy served as a special US representative for the first Term of Trump. “No country develops uranium at 60 percent of chastity (as Iran does) without building nuclear weapons.”
He also noticed concerns that were recently in the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN nuclear, about Iran failure to sufficiently compete with its inspectors. The IAEA recently declared the Islamic Republic of violating obligations not to give up for the first time in approximately 20 years.
David Petraeus, the Retired General and former CIA fights in Iraq and once led the Central Command, said it was clearly tehran “to establish a nuclear bomb.” He said – even if the leadership of the country might not judge one.
“We always let us not have a nuclear weapon, and we think we’ll know when they’re rich in weapon graduage.” But this is not something you want to rest in the best case thoughts. You need this worst case. ”
Some have a similar view.
Suzanne Maloney, a former adviser to the US Department of State on Iran Policy, said: “From the very start of this crisis, which goes all the way back to 2002, what Iran has built in terms of industrial-scale enrichment, not for civil Infrastructure and Energy Production. ”
However, Trump’s coercion Tehran “a few weeks” from the acquisition of a nuclear weapon shocked by regional experts.
Maloney says: “My worries ..
That impression compared in an informal manner in an informal way Trump’s White House is made. “The President seems to make decisions based on his gut rather than the best advice to known counselors,” he said.
Some analyst Trump was very easily in the influence of Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, who declared Iran had a secret plan that uranium was made.
Skeptics also think if the right denial of the proper decision of the US voters’ condition, which is mostly promised to “wars” in America.
“Iraq and Afghanistan wars are real watch stories,” says Petraeus.
The debate about the Iraq’s supposed program is only two years after attack on 9/11, if Americans are more united in the back of the need to hit enemies in the country. The opinion of the wisdom of foreign military joinings is especially divided today.
The Kelicic of Defense Priorities said – President George W Bush “went to the American people in a symbol in 18 months to take the authorization of time that it all authorized.”
That apparently rushing military action also reveals the prolonged stress between Trump and more followers in the camp of the camp, mainly to their Carlson.
Some erstwhile fans To the President accused him of betraying his “America first” principles by healing the leading support of the enemies in the world.
The tensions run by Carlson’s virus this week with Ted Cruz, Tromplican Senator and Trump Transport, who said that the US should support Israel in War Iran.
“I wanted to stop a lunatic who wants to kill us from getting nuclear weapons that kill millions of Americans,” Cruz told Carlson. “You say I can’t see how it can benefit America. That’s the odd … isolation.”
Carlson responded by ridicule cruz’s foreign policy credentials and said he was not “knowing any part of the country you want to fall”.
While some of the pro-Trump coalition concerned with the President Transfer to the direction of IranSome said it was wrong to suggest that he had a neoconservatur.
“Kung mobalik ka hapit 10 ka tuig, Hunyo 6 2015, sa pagkanaog niya sa escalator ug gipahayag ang iyang kandidatura,” miingon siya nga wala’y hinungdan nga mga nocones sa panahon sa mga nocado sa panahon sa kahoy. “He is perfectly compatible with this.”
