Compala, Uganda – The Rwanda Eastern Democratic Republic of Kong is in the “Command and Control” of the M23 rebels, the era has doubled the “one -sided military presence” in the DRC, according to a group of UN experts.
All parties who have still leaked and seen by the UN expert on the DRC and seen by Al Jazir have described the violation of the conflict and have blamed the neighboring governments for exploiting and increasing the current crisis.
The report was presented at the UN Security Council in May, the Reuters News Agency said. It is expected to be announced soon, the UN expert, who contributed to the report, said on the condition of anonymity to name Al Jazir without specifying the date.
Analysts have seen these reports as a necessary tool for responsibility, while Kigali and Kapala have called experts biased.
No government has responded to the request of Al Jaizira to comment on the content of the report, but both have repeatedly refused the allegations against them.
In the meantime, signing new conclusions is at risk of keeping courageous on cautious optimism The agreement of peace Rawanda and DRC in the United States last month and on Queue Discuss the peace between Kinashasa M23.
Ravanda’s ‘suggestion’, control of resources
For many years, M23, whose UN says that Rwanda has supported that Rwanda has supported – a charge rejection – the Kangoli army and his Alide Military struggle. Patriotic?? Earlier this year, M23 confiscated control of North Kiwu and South Kiwu’s capital Goma and Bukwu, respectively, which is still today.
The first UN expert report from the M23’s advance – provides a complete evaluation of the struggle by blaming the Ravanda for facilitating the rapid expansion of the rebel army.
Ravanda is providing “serious support” to M23, in which Rwanda’s government and intelligence services take “suggestions”, the report said.
In the previous reports, the United Nations expert found that there were some 3,000-4,000 The Ravandan army fought in favor of M23 at the DRC.
“(M3)) A week before the Goma attack, the Rwandan officials secretly informed the group that the group secretly (expert) informed that President Paul Kagme has decided to control Goma and Bukwu immediately,” the new report said.
Rwanda has repeatedly refused to support M23, Kigali has strongly criticized UN experts.
“These reports were written a long time ago,” President Paul Kagme said at a press conference in Kijali on July 4 that the contents of the report began to be broadcast in international media.
“They come here to confirm the story they already have,” the Ravanda leader told the expert’s UN panel.
Kagme compared the expert to a burning with a whims that murder the house but both the judge and the prosecutor works. “Those who burned (house) are on the seat of judges and prosecution.”
The UN expert report, however, criticized Kigali.
Ravandan is responsible for the action of the “D Facto Direction and Effective Control” of the Rwandan Army’s “D Facto Direction” on the M23 operations, the report said that the conduct of Ravanda is fulfilled for international approval.
The US-Dalali agreement between DRC and Rawanda last month did not include M23, but all parties said that the Qatar should follow the peace process. It also highlights that the Kangoli government should facilitate the dissection of the armed group, the Democratic Force for Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), which was established by Hatus connected to the murder of Tutsi in the 1994 Ravanda genocide. The agreement said that Ravanda should take his “defensive measures” inside the DRC.
Kigali often argues that his actions DRC In order to pay attention to the long -term security dangers created by the FDLR, UN experts strongly stated that their actions have gone beyond legal security concerns.
The experts mentioned that “the ultimate objective of the key was to control the territory of the DRC and its natural resources.”
In his report, Kolton, along with the mines in the cities seized by M33, were smuggled into Ravanda. “Once the minerals robbed in Ravanda were mixed with local production and they were effectively launched in the downstream supply chain in the germination of Rwanda,” the report said.
Ravanda was bought a portion of the smuggled minerals Boss Mining Solutions InkRepresenting AD Habimana, who has previously been trapped by the DRC in illegal smuggling of minerals, the report said.
Beyond the Ravanda, the report also outlines the violation of international law through the second neighbor by BY. Euganda??
In the battle of Ravanda/M23-DRC, Uganda People’s Defense Force (UPDF) in North Kiwu and Ituri provinces did a “fast army construction”, the report said.
This year, the army significantly increased “Effectively doubled the positions of the country in the country”.
The army of the Uganda army, which has been involved with the Kangoli army against the Alide Democratic Forces (ADF) of the rebellious movement in Uganda since 223., The “one -sided” has increased the presence of the army in the East DRC, the report said.
“The DRC government has confirmed that the new UPDF was implemented without its earlier approval and was taking a unilateral initiative outside the UPDF (Kangoli Army) frame of joint operations,” the report said.
According to expert panels, deploying questions about the purpose of the vibration, especially M23 gave the previous allegations of UPDF support. Uganda claims that the movements of the army are defensive and in their position, it is said that a D Facto Buffer zone was created in their position that protected M23 from the northern protests.
In reply to that, Adonia Ibear, the ambassador of the UN, wrote on X that the report has tried to weaken the joint military operation with the DRC. He said that after the publishing of the report, Uganda would make an official statement.
Uganda’s military commander General Muhuzi Kannarugaba also posted on X: “If a group of experts write biased reports against us, we (UPDF) are saving the lives of human beings in our region.”
In the report of UN experts, Kairaugaba called “frequently inserted public statements” in which he said that he had emphasized the close cooperation between the UPDF and the Ravandan army.
The report also alleged that Thomas Lubanga, a former Thomas, who lives in Kampa, established a Politico-Military movement to oppose the Kangoli government.
However, addressing reporters in Kampala on July, July, Lubanga said that he was forced to be deported due to the harassment of Kinashi and if his movement has been supported by the Uganda, he would “find it only at the door of Kinhasha”.
Ugandan, DRC related to Ravandan interests
Recently, Professor of the University of Antworp University, Kristophe Titka, who published reports about the actions of Yuga in the DRC, urged readers to indicate the reaction to the UN report and regional motion.
He said that Kigli and Kampa contribute to the overlay interests in the DRC – mainly related to security, political influence and financial access – but these interests have kept them in complicated relations with both cooperation and competition.
Titka argues that M33’s resurrection and rapid expansion, after the era allowed its soldiers to enter the DRC after the ADF, some of the regeneration of the M23 was resurrected to the Kampa in the Eastern DRC.
As the M13 obtained the field by the end of 224, the era reacted to the army deployment, especially for the purpose of preventing the rebels – and by extension, it is interesting from entering the area.
TTKA says that the military trick Ravanda had a similar strategic message because it was about protecting the interests of the Uganda.
Drawing from the movement and posture celebrated in the latter part of 224, Titeka indicates that the Kigali and the vibration may know about their related zones.
He said, “Some people think that there may be some agreements on the area of their choice between the vibration and the key.”
In the East DRC, “they are also friends and enemies at the same time,” he mentioned Uganda and Ravanda.
Violations of kinashasha
For UN experts, Kinhasa also takes some responsibility. In favor of Kongoli, the report is painted in the report, which is pushing to maintain sovereignty on its east regions.
As a proxy against the M23 and the Ravandan army, the government rely on the irregular Wazalendo groups and the FDLR.
While strategic, the report states that the coalition has worsened the situation of security and human rights and has led to attacks, recruitment of children and sexual violence.
The report was documented in a sample of violations of serious international humanitarian laws and rights, involving the Kongoli soldiers and Wazelondo soldiers at the same time, with the withdrawal of the Kongoli soldiers and the Wazelondo soldiers at the same time.
“In the general context of the weakest command chain, this torture was caused.”
Al Jazira should respond to these claims from the Congress government, but they did not get a reply.
Refusing the report, the president of the Ravandan accused of maintaining a biased statement against Kiwali on the panel and alleged that the Kangoli government of ignoring the complexity of the Kangoli government, saying that the 1999 199 NEX was caused by the genocide.
“75 per cent of the Percent of them blames AFC/M1 and Ravanda,” Kagme told July July’s press conference. “You will find that they never write about FDLR or how Kangoli organizations spread hatred and genocide thinking. How can experts see it?”
Talking to Al Jaizira, Ravandan Analyzer Gatete expressed his echo of Kagme’s criticism and asked questions about the credibility of the UN panel and alleged that they rarely research the field.
He said, “They sit in New York or Paris and rely on the witness of the Kangoli officers or the FDLR sympathy,” he said.
The report states that Ravanda has denied the admission of the expert group to Kijali. However, Gatete says that Rwanda initially cooperated with the panel but later considered it because the report was constantly biased and uncertain in his view. He said, “No one takes what they write.”
Rwanda and Uganda view the United Nations reports as a bias, while others see them as the tools needed for the responsibility.
Stewart Mindo, a researcher of the Kongoli Civil Society Group, said that the panel provides serious evidence that challenges the state and non-state actors.
“The panel says strict truth,” he said that despite the promise to end the alliance, the DRC government is criticized by the FDLR’s constant cooperation. “This is not just about blaming Ravanda.”
Muindo also agrees with the UN experts that the DRC faith has increased the humanitarian crisis on the Wazlendo soldiers. Although these irregular troops have not approved the FDLR, they have been involved in oppression with attacks on citizens and recruitment of child soldiers, he said.
“Despite the initiative for the ongoing peace, the efforts to stabilize the region have faced important challenges,” UN experts said. “The citizens of the conflict, the widespread displacement, insecurity and serious violations of the international humanitarian and human rights law were violated.”
