This is the US EU-Search Deal

The United States and the European Union say there is no time to deal with trading tariffs, and experts say that several basic sticky points can agree.

The talks went slowly, as the United States and the EU have been temporarily transferred to each other until July 9, since they are temporarily commissioned. If the deal is not agreed, Full interaction tariffs 50% in EUs and blocks Broadband anti-measures will come into force.

“We are talking to, but I don’t feel that they are doing a fair deal,” said US President Donald Trump, every wish, and further hope.

So what is between two sides with a relationship worth 1.68 trillion euros in 2024 (1.93 trillion)?

One of the analytically analyzes was to regulate the EU, especially the EC. The block faced regular US criticism of the United States after the introduction of important rules for Effary, Competition and Moderation.

“The Trump Administration is forced to weaken the use of economic talks and regulating economic talks and” Alberto Rizzyi “,” Alberto Rizzy “, CNBC reports, the European Council reports.

“However, any interference to the Europeans to dominate the European platforms will not be accepted and may resist its loyalty and loyalty to contempt,” he said.

Philip Luc, Director of the Strategic and International Research Center (CSIS), but discussed these issues, but the EU may not exclude its positions.

But the parties have not yet reached the story of the story, “he said.

Taxes Another important area of ​​disagreement between the United States and the EU, said Rizyi Trump considers tariffs as accounting for unjust taxes placed in US companies and goods.

This value added tax, or VAT is taken as a change in the product at each stage of the supply chain. If we have more common in the world, Trump, not in US VAT, paid it as a basis for its trading barrier and tariffs.

“However, the cost of value added in the EU treats domestic and foreign goods in the same and the European sources of Europeans, taxation is a pure internal issue, which should not participate in any trade discussion,” he said. “Taxation is a red line in the EU’s trading discussion.”

The most common issue between Washington and Brussels, the negotiations and their purpose and their purpose are the basis for the lack of and alignment.

The Jacob Kirkechnay, Peterson, with the Institute of International Economics, “There is only one sticky point, which wanted tariffs to the EU, and tariffs for the EU.”

CSIS has a variety of visits to a similar ton, our philosophical point of view, the United States and the EU.

“These negotiations How do these negotiations help us with us?

The EU has a lot of traditional views, which showed it on a zero-zero tariff offer of the transition from the White House.

European politicians – “people who believe that” they believe that they are equal to the United States “cannot make” stable “concessions, they cannot create” stable “concessions.

The United States wishes the U.S. Zero-Zero Contract or two of the best to reduce tariffs for both sides.

EU can also provide a deal like Great Britain agreed in some critical sectors to certain quotas and tariffs.

First, the blow has a lot of fundamental complaints of the administration of the United States (US) for the United Kingdom, as well as “and not possible, as well as”. “

However, it can agree with a lower rate, such as 10%, but because it is for it, they see the script.

Rizzi also suggested that “a limited deal of a limited deal to weighs or freezing tariffs for certain sectors.” But as he noted, it does not mean that a wide agreement is close.

Others are even more pessimistic.

“I am implemented in the deal,” Kirkegarard said, he said, Senior Researcher of Brugel.

“I think this consent is then remembered, and then the EU will remember, and then you will have to see what Trump did with China.

It can only be possible when there is a sudden rise and a transaction that is known, very high, economic pain.