October October 1 has emerged as an immediate intervention in Egypt’s rebuilding and stewardship in a crisis arising from Since. The Arab states have supported, the Islamic Cooperation Association and many European nations are not just a humanitarian initiative – this is a geographical plan and is a geographical plan and it is planning and it is planning a geographical plan and it is planning and planning a geographical plan and it is planned. With the support of Donald Trump, president of the United States to remove the Gaza strip.
For months, the Arab states hesitated to take on the role of rebuilding and operating the Gaza without taking a unanimous initiative to look into the main topic of Palestine Statulance. Effectively, they were resisting to the role of Palestine Authority (PA) 1.5, the responsibilities of Israel as the power of Israel’s possession. Nevertheless, they have forced them to act due to the threat of existence in the eyes of Trump and Netanyahu’s Gaza.
Mainly, Egypt’s $ 53 billion refinanation plans depend on the establishment of a local steering committee made of technocrats for the first six months, followed by PA control. But from this point of view there are basic problems that may fail before implementation.
Barrier
The Israeli Prime Minister has become clear that any PA role in Gaza has been opposed. His role is strategic: allowing the PA to implement the region will open the door for geographical political unity between Gaza and West Bank to renew negotiations for the state of Palestine.
For decades, the political establishment of Netanyahu and Israel has worked to prevent any situation that can lead to Palestine’s self -determination. The position of the dissolution and division of the Palestine provinces meets their interests, which permanently keeps the goal of the state beyond the reach.
To effectively resist Netanyahu, Arab states need to buy as many other artists as possible, especially the Trump administration, which has the benefit of force Israeli premiere to accept.
Netanyahu can still try to reduce his implementation by imposing bureaucratic obstacles, military or financial restrictions-a part-renovation of the well-known Israeli Playbook is a great option on the table to prevent Gaza’s ethnic cleaning by war and long-term deprivation.
PA in crisis
There is another major obstacle to implementing the Arab plan beyond Israeli resistance: PA. Under the leadership of President Mahmud Abbas, it is a deeplying organization, not political relevance after the Oslo contract collapsed.
Over the years, Abbas has continued to coordinate security with Israel, increase his dictatorship rules and increase the incense of his legality by further increasing his dictatorship rules and refusing to elections from 1 SINC. Their leadership has been defined by increasing repression – due to any resistance of opposition parties, political renovation and Israeli aggression.
Without a viable political process, PA has become the appendix of Israel and the appendix of the apartheid, implementing security on the west coast with no real right to rule as an independent existence. This has led to the widespread Palestine. Abbas’s grip on power is needed, especially for the Israeli policies of ethnic cleansing against activists and groups have demanded a more conflicting view.
PA failure has especially shine in the past 16 months of the Israeli massacre attack on the Gaza and the West coast. Abbas is widely absent from an attempt to combine the Palestine resistance, reflecting his silence and inactivity to its obsolete.
Not only does his government lose the confidence of the Palestinian people, but it has also been greatly irrelevant to the widespread geographical -political players, including Israel, the US and the Arab states.
A political vacuum
Abbas’s belief in believing in Israel and PA’s international donors compels his people to prioritize the demands, which are widely against each other. Since then their domestic popularity has declined, its dictatorship has become even more intense.
Recently, he hit Palestine resistance groups in the North West Bank City Janein, and Israel removed financial support to the families of Palestine, killed or injured.
Due to the prolonged social compact between the Palestine people and their leadership, the PA only underlines the extent to which the PA tried to satisfy Israel and the west at the expense of legalization at home.
Now, Palestinian stewardship is urgently needed in Gaza, the Arab states find themselves without a real, feasible partner. The existing PA leadership is weak, corrupt and unable to effectively administer the bar.
Some of the Arab world, as well as the Palestine civilian society and Diespora, are putting pressure on the new leadership. However, Abbas and his loyalists have resisted any such efforts. In the middle of February, PA banned 33 delegates at the Palestinian national conference held at Doo-who tried to survive from the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)-West to re-emerge from the west.
At the same time, Abbas has given a loan waiver to the members of the UAE supporter of Fatah, especially Mohammad Dahlan, Abu Dhabi, in an attempt to accommodate the Arab government.
Palestine leadership may change the potential returns of Dhohan in dynamics, but this will not solve the original crisis of the legal crisis of harassing PA. A political change at the top is not the same as systemic reforms, and without the widespread commitment of national unity and representation of representation, there is a danger of any new leadership structure that inherited the same failure defined during the tenure of Abbas.
A moment of opportunity
Abbas’s confusion over Palestinian politics and jumping on his revival process provides the opportunity to renew the Palestine’s national movement. If the Arab states can navigate to the political mining sector of Netanyahu’s intuition, Abbas’s selfishness and internal Palestine region, they may go to Gaza to a more stable and autonomous future.
However, if the circle of Abbas and his stuck officials is controlled, this attempt will be another unsuccessful attempt in the harmony of Palestine and will strengthen the status of Israeli dominance and Palestine dissatisfaction.
Gaza’s future remains. This intervention by the Arab states can be a positive step for Palestine’s self-determination-or it can become a historic lost opportunity. If Abbas continues to monopoly, if the PLO remained a hollow shell, and if Netanyahu continues the campaign to vandalize any form of Palestine’s sovereignty, the Arab scheme would have died after the arrival.
At the moment the decisive action is essential for the political renewal of the Palestine, and the international commitment to the self -determination of the genuine Palestine. The Arab state plans are yet to see if the structural obstacles can overcome its way. But if the Palestinian leadership crisis has not already sealed Ghaza’s fate, the time to improve the course before it is late.
The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and it is not necessary to reflect al -Jazir’s editorial role.