The UK Parliament approved the assistant death bill: how would it work? | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Explained news


Narrowly in the British Parliament Voted By marking the important moment of social reforms in the history of the country, in favor of the bill to legalize assistant death for the sick.

The Act was approved by a 314-291 opinion at the House of Commons on Friday and eliminated the largest parliamentary barrier, and now the House of Lords will be scrutinized in the House of Lords in the UK upper chamber.

When it goes to the lords, this process can cause further repairs, but the upper hall is usually unaware of the laws approved by the members selected by the members of the Commons.

Friday’s opinion came after several hours of emotional discussion with references to personal stories in the chamber. In November followed the vote that approved the law in principle.

Earlier, the House of Commons voted on this topic in 95, when the assistance was rejected by the legality.

What is the assistant in the bill?

The “Terminal Sick (the end of life)” Bill is mentally capable in England and Wales, the terminal sick adults, whose lives have six months or less to live, have the right to end their lives with medical help.

After receiving the green light from the doctor and the green lantern of the panel, including a social worker, senior legal person and a psychiatrist, patients should be able to take fatal medicines by themselves.

Assistant is different from suicide DeathWhere a healthcare physician or other person gives deadly injection at the patient’s request.

Under the current law, a police inquiry, lawsuit and jail sentence for 14 years may be imposed on the one who has helped to end his life.

Learning changes in the original draft of the new bill included the appointment of independent lawyers for the creation of disability, autism or mental health conditions and the creation of a disability advisory board.

Logistics still need to be hit by the fact that any service that supports or supports it will be integrated into the National Health Services (NHS) or a separate unit available by the third party.

The bill will not be implemented in North Ireland or Kotland, which is its own opinion on this topic.

What are the arguments for assisting death?

The supporters of this bill say that they will ensure the honor and compassion of people with a terminal diagnosis, who should be given a choice on whether to get rid of their suffering.

Labor MP Kim Leadbiter, who submitted the bill, told The Guardian newspaper that he should give the sick people the rights to their body that allowed a woman to have an abortion.

She said, “The more I fight to behave better through the society of the disabled, the more I fight for the rights of the people who have died,” she said.

For this bill, some lawyers have argued that the present laws discriminate against the poor, who have to face a potential trial for helping their loved ones, while rich people can travel abroad to legally access services.

Conservative MP Peter Bedford spoke against this inequality. He said, “Every week, at least one Britha is taking Switzerland to the price of stressful and often loneliness, at a cost of $ 5 ($, $ 5),” he said. “This bill is not about losing life, it’s about reducing death.”

Labor MP Maurin Burke spoke about her brother David, who was suffering from pancreatic cancer. She said, “He never knows that he would have a chance to stand in this place and to tell me to make sure that his colleagues do not go through what others did.” “I have done here today by saying here by my brother.”

Opinion polls have shown that the majority of the United Kingdom’s citizens helped die. Sara Wattan, the chief executive of the UK-based honor in the death campaign, said that the vote sent the “clear message” and “Parliament is public and change”.

Although there is no schedule for the implementation of the bill, it should start within four years of the law approval, under the terms of the law.

What does the opponent say?

Opponents are afraid that insecure people may be forced to end their lives or pressurize their family and society for fear of burden.

Due to the voting on Friday, protesters from outside the Parliament urged politicians not to make governor health care, NHS, “national suicide service”.

After the initial vote last year, many MPs supported the bill and said that Safeguards were weakened. The most important change in this bill since last November was to reduce the need to sign in to any decision. In November, 23 people voted with the support of 55 majority (3030 votes 275).

The group, which changed the law, was referred to as “seriously defective and dangerous” and argued that politicians did not have enough time to consider its consequences.

“The members of the Parliament had more than 3 130 amendments or less than five minutes per change in the bill for less than 5 hours. Someone thinks that this is enough time to consider a change in a draft law that is virtually life and death?” Gordon McDonald’s CEO of the group said.

Opponents expressed concern over the impact of death assisting on state-NHS finance, and how they could request funding for sub-core care and how to change relationships between doctors and their patients.

Personal opponents of the law include Tanny Gray-Thomps, Disabled MPs and Paralympic Medals. In an interview to Sky News, she said that if they have access to expert care, no one will die “terrible death”.

She said, “It is really careful that people are disabled due to the cost of health and social care, because they are being removed, it is removed later, so ending their lives is the only choice,” she said.

Assistant death laws have been introduced in many countries. About 300 million people around the world have legal access to this option, according to the reputation of death.

In March, the Ill of Man was the first place to pass the assistant to British Islands, which was chosen to end their lives for a terminal sick adults diagnosed with 12 months of age or less.

Switzerland gave legal approval to the death assisted in 1944, as it became the first country in the world to allow this practice on the condition that this purpose was not selfish.

In Europe, some kind of legal assistants have died in the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Spain, Portugal and Austria.

In the United States, this practice is known as “Physician-assisted death” and is legal in 10 states, in Australia it has been legal in every state since 2022.

In Latin America, Colombia legalized the desire for a terminal sick adult patients in 2014, while Ecuador reduced harmony in 224 and assisted suicide.

Canada is the most generous system of the world’s assistant death. Terminals were provided maid or medical assistance for sick adults in 2016 in 2016. In 2, the need to suffer from terminal illness was removed and now the scheme is opening for those who suffer from mental illness.

What other countries are planning to legalize?

The bill on Assisted death in Scotland is being considered. The initial opinion was approved in May, but before the law is taken, two more fare for parliamentary investigation will be needed.

French President Emmanuel Macron has endorsed the bill to gain the death of some people in the last phase of the terminal disease. It was approved by the National Assembly in May and now the lower hall will go to the Senate before the second reading.

According to the death of dignity, 17 American states are considering assisting this year.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *