The ones to build nuclear reactor in the month of 2030

The US Space Agency is in fastening plans to build a nuclear reactor in the month of 2030, according to the US media.

It is part of the US ambitions to build a permanent basis for people to live on the lunar face.

According to politician, the principal of NASA refers to similar Chinese plans and Russia and said that those two countries “can express a continuous zone” of the month.

But the questions remained how realistic the purpose and timeframe, was given new and fluent budget budgets, and some scientists were concerned about geopolitical purposes.

Countries including US, China, Russia, India and Japan are hurried to explore the face of the moon, with some planning on permanent human lodging.

“To advance this critical technology to support a future economic economy, the discretion of Secretary Sean Donald Trump, wrote to NASA, according to the Nasy Yord Timse.

Mr. Duffy calls suggestions from commercial companies to build a reactor to make at least 100 kilowatts of power.

It’s very small. A typical wind turbine turbine creates 2-3 megawatts.

The idea of building a nuclear reactor as a source of moon power is not new.

In 2022 on issuing three $ 5m contracts with companies to design a reactor.

And in May this year, China and Russia announced that they plan to build an automated nuclear nuclear station in the month of 2035.

Many scientists agree that this is the best or perhaps only one way to give continued power of the lunar face.

A lunar day equals four weeks in the world, consist of two weeks of continuous sunshine and two weeks in the dark. That makes the solar power of solar power very hard.

“Ever established a moderate lunar home to handle a small crew to be generally generally.

“Nuclear energy doesn’t just want, inevitably,” he added.

Lionel Wilson, Professor of Earth An and Planet Science at Lancaster University, believe it is possible to put the reactors in the month 2030 “he gave the reactors in time with designers for small reactors.

“It’s just a thing that has enough of the artemis to build the moon infrastructure afterwards,” he added, referring to the Artemis Spaceflight Program that refers to the moon shipping.

There is also some questions around the safe.

“Radioactive material by the world’s surroundings leads safety concerns. There is a special license to do so, but it is not trustworthy,” as Dr Simeon Barber at Open University.

Mr Duffy’s directive comes as a surprise to NASA’s recent riot after announced by Mr Trump’s administration of 24% of the budget of NASA on 2026.

That includes cuts of a significant number of science programs such as sample samples of Mars that refers to the return of the samples from the ground planet.

Scientists also concern this notice a political transition to the new international race of the month.

“We seem to come back to the old first days of the Space competition, which, from a scientific perspective, a little disappointing and about,” as Dr Barber.

“Competition can generate change, but if you have a more visible interest in national interest and to establish ownership, then you can lose the greater picture exploring the solar system and forward,” he added.

Mr Duffy’s comments about the potential for China and Russia can “declare a continuous zone” in the month referring to an agreement called Accord of Artemis.

In 2020 seven countries signed the agreement to establish principles of how countries need to co-operate on the face of the moon.

The approval includes the so-called safety areas established around operations and assets built in the moon counties.

“If you build a nuclear reactor yes any sort of base of the month, you can start claiming you have a safe place around it, because you have equipment,” Dr. Barber.

“To some people, this is why,” we own it a little bit of the month, we will move here and you cannot enter “,” he explained.

Dr. Barber’s pointed with obstacles to overcome before placing a nuclear reactor in the moon to use people.

Artemis 3 of NASA 3 intends to send people to the lunar face by 2027, but it faced a series of set-backs and uncertainty around.

“If you get nuclear power for a base, but you have no way to get people and equipment there, then it is not used,” he added.

“Plans don’t appear to be together at the moment,” he said.