The British High Court has ruled that the government’s decision to allow Israel to export Israel into the export of Lockheid Martin F -35 Jet, despite acknowledging that they can be used in the violation of international humanitarian law.
In a 2 -fan decision on Monday, Judge Stephen Men and Karen Steyn said the case was a “more focusing point” than just jet parts.
“The point is that the UK should withdraw with certain multi-faceted protection cooperation or whether the court is free… because some UK-made elements can be supplied to Israel or finally supplied to Israel, and it can be used in the commission of international humanitarian violations in Gaza’s struggle,” said in this regard.
“According to our Constitution, this is a strictly sensitive and political issue for the executive, which is responsible for Parliament in a democratic way and eventually responsible for the voters, not the courts.”
Currently, the United Kingdom contributes to the elements of the F -35 in the international defense program that produces the bomber.
But the Palestine Human Rights Organization Al-hakBased on the West Bank occupied by the decision to exempt these areas in September last year, some export licenses were taken into account against the UK business and trade department (DBT) in January.
During the May hearing in May, Al-Haq said that the government’s decision to send part of the jet was illegal because it causes “significant risk of facilitating crime.”
In the same month, Defense Secretary John Hele said that the suspension would affect his “entire F -35 program” and will have a “deep impact on international peace and security.”
Following Monday’s decision, Al-Haq’s chief Shawan Jabin said, “Despite the outcome of today, the voice of the Palestine people has been concentrated in this case and showing significant public support and this is the beginning.”
“Civil society and human rights organizations have done significant performance by exposing serious government failures against the Palestinians, and we can move forward in the UK and beyond the government,” he said, challenging the Palestinian change and he said.
‘Hold the result’
Reporting from London, Al Jazir’s Milana Veselinovic said that the F -35 Fighter Jet building is part of the “World Program” where many nations build different parts and are all built in different countries.
“Britain is about 15 percent of each F35 jet, however, it does not especially make it part for Israel,” Veselinovic explained.
“So, what the UK was arguing is that if they prevented the area from exporting, which could affect the entire international program, then it will affect the supply chain, then they will also affect their NATO allies.
However, Al-Haq has argued that by creating a part of the global lake, using weapons in Gaza, the UK was in the violation of international law with the Geniva Convention.
“But the High Court rejected the government and accepted the UK’s argument that the UK is violating the international law.
Export licenses
In September last year, Foreign Secretary David Lammy announced that the government was suspending 30 out of 350 export licenses After reviewing the international humanitarian law, the goods used during the Israeli war in Gaza.
However, according to the Global Advocci Organization Oxfam International, involved in the Al-Haque case against DBT, partial ban does not include British-made F-35 parts, including probes, laser targeting system tires and ejector seat.
In addition, a report Palestine supporters It was found in May that military items have been exported to Israel despite suspension.
Ever since the war started in October 1, at least 56,500 people were killed and injured in the Israeli attacks and injured in the 833,4.4 Eother.
