Rwanda agrees to accept ‘Third-KNT’ in the United States | Donald Trump News


Ravanda has confirmed that President Donald Trump has accepted the US deportation immigrants as he tried to extend a huge uproar from the North American country.

On Tuesday, a spokesman for the Ravanda government, Yolande Makolo acknowledged that the African country has agreed to get a refugee person up to 250.

Ravanda is now the third African country after South Sudha and Esawatney.

“Rwanda has agreed to accept migrants by 950, as almost every Rawand’s family has suffered from displacement and our social values are based on re -integrating and rehabilitation,” Makolo said in a statement received by Royators News Agency.

But the efforts of the Trump administration to rapidly extinguish the US immigrants have increased numerous human rights concerns, at least not to send people to “third-party countries.”

Some of those countries, including Ravanda, have been criticized for their human rights records, making the lawyers fear of the safety of the immigrants.

In the meantime, other critics have rejected Trump for being used as an African country A “dumping ground” For immigrants with criminal records.

In this week’s statement, Makolo appeared to be expecting some of the criticisms, and it underlines that there would be a final opinion on who could reach the country in Rwanda.

“Under the agreement, Ravand has the ability to recognize every person proposed for rehabilitation,” she said.

“The approveds will be supported by employees’ training, health care and accommodation to jump their lives in Ravanda, and the opportunity to contribute to the fastest growing economy in the world in the last decade.”

Trump’s collective deportation campaign

In 224, Trump successfully launched a campaign for re -election in the United States that he would expel the population of unacceptable immigrants in the country. This group is estimated.

But many of them are a long -term members of their communities, and critics quickly noticed that Trump lacks the infrastructure needed for such a large number of efforts.

In response to this, the Trump administration has paid money to the related projects from abroad to live forever. For example, the “One Big Beautiful Bill” signed in the law in July kept $ 45 billion for immigration arrest centers, many of which will run private contractors.

An additional $ 4.1 billion in the law is dedicated to hiring and training more officers with an immigration and custom enforcement (ICE), with another $ 2.1 billion aside for the bonus.

But the Trump administration has given the highest priority to the migrants from the country, withdrawing legal challenges and such deportation.

The critics say that refugees have denied their right to their right process, no time has been given to challenge their removal.

Then there are cases where Undencamented migrants have been refugeed in the “third-party countries” where they cannot speak the language.

After taking over in January, Trump began to deport countries like India, China, Iran and Afghanistan in places like Panama, where the migrants were taken into custody and later in the hotel.

Trump has also accusing him of 200 men from 200Most of them were a member of the gang to authorize the removal of El Salvador immediately in March. Lawyers have doubted Trump’s allegations, and argued that many of his customers were considered a member of the gang based on their tattoos and fashion selections.

El Salvador has received $ 6 million as part of a contract to hold men in the maximum security jail, terrorism ban center or sect. Violation of human rights Has been documented.

These men were released as part of A last month Prisoner exchange With Venezuela, but a federal court in the United States Keeps the weight continuing Whether the Trump administration violated the judge’s order by allowing the trump administration to leave the first place.

The deportation of Africa

In May, the Trump administration unveiled efforts to start African countries to start the “third-party” deportation, and this created further concerns about human rights.

Initially, Libya was flooded as a destination, and when the judge stopped the departure of the proper process, the immigrants loaded it to a flight.

Later, the Libyan government rejected the report that the US refugees were ready to accept non -civilian immigrants.

But the Trump administration went ahead to send eight migrants to the flight at the end of that month ToThe American Foreign Department considers to travel to Americans very dangerous.

Judges in Massachusetts decided that the flight was finally turned to Jibuti after deciding that eight persons on the board were not given enough opportunity to challenge their removal.

Seven of them are from Laos, Vietnam, Cuba, Mexico and Myanmar. Only one was from South Sudan.

The Trump administration said “Sicos” and “Berber”?? The spokesman on July 4 promised to keep them in South Sudan with the US Independence Day holiday.

The US Supreme Court paved the way in the late June, when it issued a brief, signed order to allow South Sudan to be expelled. Six conservative members of the bench took favor of the Trump administration, while the three left -wing judges issued intense disagreements.

He argued that there was no evidence that the Trump administration had made sure that eight people would not be harassed while in the hands of South Sudan. He also described the deportation with a hurry and deprived men of the opportunity to appeal.

“The affected class members had no opportunity to research the South Sadh, to deal with the risk of torture or death, or to talk to anyone about their concerns,” the judges have called the government’s actions “clearly illegal”.

In the middle of July, the Trump administration also Aswatini started the deportationA small, landlocked country ruled throughout the monarchy. These included five deported persons from Laos, Vietnam, Jamaica, Cuba and Yemen.

“The plane was so uniquely forced by the individuals that their countries refused to take them back,” Written On social media.

Five people have reported that their customers have refused access to their customers who were kept in the maximum security jail.

Cozing up to Trump?

Ravanda is not very aware of the newly announced deportation. It is not yet clear when the deportation flights of Ravanda will start or it is not yet clear who will be included in the flights.

The royators, however, will be paid to Ravanda for accepting the deportation as a grant. The amount is not yet known.

Ravanda has also set these parameters for whom they can accept. The outbreak flights will not be allowed to any child’s sexual criminals, and the countries will accept only those who are not criminal backgrounds or whose terms have been fulfilled.

But in the announcement of the deportation, the trend of the Ravanda officers, who have been closely related to the Trump administration, is under way.

In June, President Trump claimed credit Is bringing peace Ravanda and his neighbor, between the Democratic Republic (DRC) of Kongo.

He invited the leaders of both countries to attend the White House and a ceremony here Sign the peace agreement?? However, the critics mentioned that the deal was unclear and did not mention the support of the Ravanda for the M23 paramilitary group that committed assault in the DRC.

Trump was free to pursue another priority of his: Gain access to valuable minerals There is a key to technology development in regions like copper and lithium.

In an interview to the Associated Press News Agency, Ravandan’s political analyst Gonzaga Mugnwa said that his recent trick of his government seems to have reflected “mantra”.Happiness to President Trump ”.

Mugnwa explained that the Tuesday agreement to accept the US immigrants would strengthen the shared bonds of both countries.

He said, “This agreement increases the strategic interests of Ravanda’s Trump administration.”

Ravanda had earlier signed an agreement with the United Kingdom to accept the shelter in the country in 2022.

But the British Supreme Court signed the agreement in 223 and ruled that it was not a safe third country to send the shelter to the shelter.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *