Reliance on Israel-Hamas puts Gaza Ceasefire at risk

The second stage of Gaza stops often doubted; Now it looks like it’s dead once it’s meant to start.

Anxiety is to mount the war return to this broken territory, deepening deep suffering of Palestinians and life threatening the remaining hostages held by Hamas.

Israel, backed by the United States, says that there is a new deal now, after the first phase of the agreement ended Saturday. And it stopped all humanitarian help to Gaza until Hamas also accepted this new version.

“A violation of violation,” Cairo’s strongly said. Egypt as Qatar, two Arab’s two mediaors in this process with the US, also accused of Israel’s violation of international human law through “use of food as a warfare”.

Under the terms of agreement, 600 trucks carrying important human assistance to enter Gaza daily – and many numbers crossed by 42 days in the first round.

There is also a strong chorus of criticism from other Arabic states, as well as humanitarian leaders.

UN Secretary General Andónio Gerres, who came to Cairo for the emergency Arab on Tuesday’s rebuilding Gaza, called for “immediate” continuation. He encourages “all parties to make all efforts to prevent returns of battles”.

Under the agreement, which came into effect on 19 January, this is the week of Israel should be pulling its troops from the Philadelphi corridor along the egypt-gaza border and negotiations should intensify to end the war, and release more Palestinian prisoners in exchange.

But the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, saying US envoy Steve Witkoff has a new plan.

Witkoff has not announced his proposal, but Netanyahu said the first stage of the ceasefire was 50 days, to cover the Islamic holiday in the Passover, and continue negotiating.

Hamas, in return, released in half of the remaining hostages, according to Netanyahuu. Israel says 59 held captive and “to 24” believed alive.

On Monday Hamas criticizes sudden transition as a “a bad test (in Israel) to avoid agreement and avoid entering negotiations for the second round”.

The group jokes with hostages as the most important leverage and make all the effort to keep them until it ends with the terms ready to accept.

One day earlier, the Foreign Minister of Egypt Badr Abdelatty was highlighted: “There is no choice in honest and fully implementing all parties on signed in January.”

Israel prints reports of an Egyptian proposal for Hamas to release three living hostages and a part of the Philadelphi corridor,

But a diplomat of Arab’s knowledge of talks says they have not continued to Cairo, even though “technical teams often discussion”.

There is always a dangerous standoff at this point.

The Prime Minister of Netanyahu’s primary purposes will always “destroy” the military force of Hamas’s military and political grip.

Their very choreographed ceremonies and showing the strength of the hostage releases have been angry with Israel and rejected it, while it was weak, Hamas was many in charge of Gaza.

Arabic Diplomatic sources say that while Hamas accepts it will not be involved in running Gaza once it’s over the war, it doesn’t get the rest of the rest.

Israel cannot be accepted, and its most ally, the US.

Sunday, the US National Security Councue gives full support to the “next step” in Israel. It was set up firmly in Hamas, saying that the group “indicates that no longer interested in a negotiation negotiation”.

In a video address, the Prime Minister Netanyahu describes President Donald Trump as “the greatest friend who was Israel’s in the White House”.

But media media says Washington to pressure Israeli leader not restarting the fight.

That kind of twisting arm is widely recognized pushing the ceasefire in line even before the Trump team enters the White House on 20 January.

Also pressure from Israel is more concerned to see all hostages come home.

On Sunday night, hundreds protesters have broken police obstacles outside the residence of the Prime Minister of Jerusalem.

The President of the United States, praised by his supporters as “best peace”, can also shape the parameters of war or peace.

Meanwhile, both sides are ready to keep the fight while weighing their choices for winning a peace in their terms.