Ref Watch: Man Utd Defender Patrick Dorga has been properly sent for ‘really bad’ challenge against Ipswich | Football news

Former Judge Dermot Gallagher returns to review the incidents from Prime Minister Patrick Dorg in Manchester United 3-2 Win Manchester United by Ipspich and Erlinga Haaland forbidden goal for Manchester City Verses Tottenham Hotspur …

Man Utd 3-2 Ipswich

Incident: We are going to the red card united in their victory through Ipswich for Dorg. He turned out a straight red card for his challenge to Omari Hutchinson just before the break.

Dermot says: “It’s fantastic (Intervention from Charm) because if you look at the second corner, it’s really a bad challenge.

“I’m not saying he doesn’t mean he does it, but it’s a really wrong challenge.

“He caught him for the lower legs, he comes from a distance, he has speed, hitting the paste. The varren told England to look at him, which he did and did it and did it.

“Due to the position of the judge, he does not see the size of that offense. He actually raised her throwing again, so he thought it was a foul.

“When he went to the screen, he realized he misunderstood. It’s for it for it.”

Incident: Earlier in the first half, Alejando Garnacho wanted a penalty, but did Darren England gave that right?

Dermot says: “100%. He felt the contact and went too slow.

“The judge correctly received it because he worked hard to enter that position. He saw him and he could hear the minimum contact and says no.”

Tottenham Hotspur 0-1 Man City

Incident: Haaland thought he achieved his second goal of the Spurs game at the stopping time, but he was excluded for handball.

Prime Minister League Center matches said: “The call of judges without goal for handball Haaland was checked and confirmed vari – without concluding evidence that will overturn the decision on the field.”

Dermot says: “Everyone thinks this rule is sharply unless it comes in. Jarred Gillett, the judge is the key. He gives handball. Whistling. Whistling.

“Var checked and checked and concluded that there was no evidence that the judge was wrong.

“I would say evidence supported by the judge … because he is Golbir, it must be banned.

“The key question is that the judge bore him on the field.”

Liverpool 2-0 Newcastle

Incident: In winning Liverpool over Newcase, there was an early shout for Liverpool Sentence for Levis Hall Challenge on Mohamed Salah

Dermot says: “Again, this is all about the judge. He feels that the hall that salad has switched out of the box.

“If Stuart Attwell didn’t give a foul, 100% punishment because he brought the hall.

“But the judge whistled for the first foul, so it’s a free kick for Newcast, not a punishment for Liverpool.”

Incident: It was a goal that came late in the game in Ibrahim Konato game on Nick Pope.

Dermot says: “It’s a real call. The core has his hands on the papal shoulder until the goalkeeper finishes the ball and he rejects him.

“The expectation of all is a free kick. Newcass players react immediately, Liverpool players almost predict that they will come.

“It’s a light foul to give it if you spot it.”

Nottingham Forest 0-0 Arsenal

Incident: In the unresolved between Nottingham Forest and Arsenal, the forest claimed after Riccardo Calafiori established contact with Callum Hudson-Odos in the box.

Was that enough for punishment?

Dermot says: “That’s the essence – was it enough? I don’t think there. There’s a little contact, but is that enough to put it down? I’m not sure.

“Calafiori goes out of the challenge, forward and not convinced that he fouled it, he was trying to bring the ball. He attacked, but it’s on him anyway.

“For me, the judge is right there and play.”

Incident: The cross of Gurry’s tree seems to hit Chris’s tree inside the forest frame. Was it handball?

Dermot says: “It wins here forwardly with the law, because if it achieves it, it is forbidden.

“But the law here is completely clear, if it’s on the floor, it’s a hand support and can’t be given as handball.

“He does whatever it is possible to get out of the way. Nobody wants a punishment because it just doesn’t sit right with people.”

Brighton 2-1 Bournemouth

Incident: Brighton was awarded a punishment against Borenemouth when Kepa Arrizabalgaga was killed by Joao Pedro.

The decision was given in the field Michael Oliver and confirmed Var.

Andona Irila believes that Joao Pedro bought the sentence and forgot about trying to achieve results. Is that correct or not, was that an accurate decision?

Dermot says: “Definitely. The gift is in the ball for me. Once a player crosses the ball by the goalkeeper, it must be reassured not to take down.

“He will say it’s always there, but it takes Pedro and it’s a penalty.

“He stopped the player and hurried. People say” What can he do? “But if it doesn’t do it, Pedro will just run the ball into the empty net.

“Kepa doesn’t get the ball and Pedro is smart, it’s what he’s inherited forward to doing it – protects the balls from the goalkeeper, which he did.

“Once it does, the goalkeeper must bear his country, which does not work.”

Wolves 1-2 Fulham

Incident: The wolves claimed when Marshall Munets dropped in the field after contact from Issa Diop. Complaints waved by Peter Bank.

Dermot says: “There’s a little contact (for a sentence request), but the two players gather.

“The player is already on the way down. He almost feels Diop bouncing him, not he violated it.”

Cristal Palace 4-1 Aston Villa

Incident: In the victory, the Cristal Palace against Aston Villa was a really narrow-flown call against Ollie Vatkins. Did they come to the true decision?

Dermot says: “If the technology said they were, then the fact. People are frustrated because it’s tight, but what we asked for the beginning was to be of yes or no.

“You must be careful what you want … technology is only in offside. This weekend in the FA CUP are a half-automated offside, so there will be another move in a different area and we hope people embrace it.

“I think it will really work really well.”

Brentford 1-1 Everton

Incident: In Brentford, Beto went on goal. Ethan Pinnock slipped and brought Beto as the last man, but Everton Striker became and crossed. Has he stayed down, would that be red?

Dermot says: “I don’t think there’s any doubt. It’s one of the most unusual situations I’ve ever seen.

“He was thinking” I could score, I want to continue, “but he gets up so fast, the judge thinks he has his better opportunity alone.

“Like it was, it didn’t come out. But if it was stopped on the ground, the red card.

“Pinnock didn’t refuse it because Beto picked up and he was still on goal. It was key to the judge and he played an advantage. It’s a hard call.”

Incident: Brentford had a goal of turning off in the second half. Yoane Vissa pulled himself, but was excluded in the comprehensive despite Jarrad Brantwaite was on the line.

Dermot says: “It’s a great place from the line, because Pickford is coming out and he actually behind Pickford.

“Is Isa just one defense counsel and there must be two counsel. People only think of just one, because the goalkeeper is usually there, so the law of the two defenders.

“It’s usually one plus goalkeeper, but as soon as Pickford passed next, he has in the most protrosel position.”

Kilmarnock 2-4 Rangers

Incident: It’s interesting last night in the game of Rangers. The judge originally gives a goal-blow after Yanis Hagi was filmed from the game.

He changed his mind, and Rangers achieved the result of the an anconel given.

Dermot says: “This is one of the two in Scotland last night that it becomes a consequence, not a decision made.

“I think this is an angle. The judge gives a goal-shot, but he probably had some contribution and he gave an angle.

“It becomes a point, because they achieved from him.”