Reddit argues that unlike other social media platforms Social Australia is on social media

In moving that is worthy of the post Not like the other subreddit girlsReddit, one of the largest social platforms in the world, is about a real social media site, as the company wants to overturn Australia’s Under 16s Law from Social Media.

In a Claims filed with Australia’s primary courtsThe redit law, which came into force on December 10, limits free political discourse by preventing children from exercising online, and should be challenged.

And if the law is not struck down, the company should be banned from the law because it does not meet the law’s definition of “social media platform.”

Reddit essentially asked Australia’s high court to address some of the questions raised about the rule, which requires 10 major services to disable 16s accounts and prevent them from using the app. Critics argue that the law violates children’s rights, and the company has sought to raise questions about the “social media” shown.

Indeed, calling itself “a collection of public forums organized by subject,” reddit “in its filing to make a case that can be used to activate ‘in a social way’.”

“Reddit enables online interaction about content posted on the site. This is not related to other users, or to post other events, or to moderate events,” the filing reads.

In a post Following the suit, reddit admin thastbluejay said the law is “some serious expression issue for everyone on the internet.”

“While we agree with the importance of protecting people under 16, this law has a very good verification effect to do different communities, and to create a political discussion that is inclusive,” said the post.

Reddit also stated that a significant portion of content on the social media platform can be accessed without an account, and that children under the age of 16 would be better protected if they were allowed to have accounts that could be restricted.