No agreement or Agreement, Mark Cashy Hyn Macheni To Manage New Connection With America?


Donald Trump after Canada, a week after Canada – Mexico Agreement – Mexico Agreement – Many things are wrong.

However, Mark Carnny reveals at the Tuesday Tuesday, at least one thing a clear transparency Tuesday.

In the business and investment, we share in working with the United States with a business relationship with our business relationship with the United States.

Such comments from Carnation of your Carnation in March With the United States, it was “the old relationship” “has been completed.” And in the last century, the largest minister of Chief Minister will remain amazing to hear this in the last century.

But it’s hard to argue.

“It’s that” Tuesday “Tuesday” Tuesday “is”

CASEEE is still the case with the argument of the argument. But there is no agreement or agreement – Terms or No Territory – Canada How to browse this new world.

What does ‘agreement’ like Trump?

In some ways, the Canadian crisis seems more than two months in the past two months.

Trump is less about relief Canada. Some tariffs are below the fear of the first. And people who are in Canada are more than many other countries than many other countries.

But they still have tariffs. The effective rapal dose is now limited to the United States in the USA It is estimated 18.6 per cent – The highest since 1933. It is estimated that 13.1 percent of Canada, the effective speed is 13.1 percent.

The 930 year of the 930-year-old marvement of 90 years of business donations to obtain a 90-year business exchange is second coming. Wrote this week.

Trump’s behavior is being in opposition to the speculation that describes historical methods, such as specification as a slap. He is willing to accept the dangers of American economy that it will not be any damage between American economic and American members.

See | What is the impact of Trump tarifts?

The new USA Terms price businesses, how does consumers affect?

The businesses around the world and consumers of the United States President of the United States are 35 percent of the highest element taxs from 60 countries.

“America is currently in the process of changing all his business relationships,” Cardy says. The United States of America The economic economy is in the United States, investing in the United States, performing the interests of investing in the United States and new determination. “

The conservative leader Pierrevivine has tried to live this week for the United Kingdom of Logarian Minister for the United States. In addition, the goal is still “The US market should be accessible to the United States.

These comments are at least at least these comments at least the people of Canada in this situation.

Of course, even if the German government comes from the Trump management, information shows that any agreement will change that any agreement will change. Similarly, it seems that it seems to be unable to imagine that the same permanent pre -2026 formality does not return to President or be born.

Is it a new third option time?

Canada’s relationship with the United States and pulling contact with the United States is one of the strongest Canadian history. But the current period may have one in common In Canada, in 1972, she received briefly in 1972.

Fifty-three years ago, Mitles Shrew and then Foreign Minister came to a 24-page paper, Canadian US Connections for the future options. About Canadian economic and cultural freedom and a Continuous emergency movement in American administrationShadda Canada had three options.

First, Canada may continue in a continuous way, Canada when it comes to the United States and challenges problems. Second, Canada can go to a zealous disorder with the United States, perhaps “a whole long strategic strategy to enhance and reduce the current Canadian exposure.”

See | The former NL Prime Minister on Carnie’s approach

The Denland Egetern Caster’s approach “Denland Easter Caster Application”

The Andrew courage, former New Newifcordland and Radifter Premier helps to negotiate with the US <የድምፅ> The way <የተረጋጋ, ምክንያታዊ, የካናዳ መንገድ> He said. This is the start of a high-election tax until the United States President Donald Trudd Donald Truds.

For the third situation, the Canadians generally defended Canadians under another government. And “called”The third optionIt is associated with some nationality relationships, associated with some national economic interventions, and it is invisible in new business colleagues.

There is no evidence that there was no different encouragement than the third option. But a sharpen explanation, “Canada strongly reads the way to speak as a word. Slossing in the spring election. (If the importance of Polyovar is the need to strengthen the Canadian economy of that case, some of the times some of them are online online?)

In The shrink of the sharkThe paper has helped traditional traditional cultural institutions, but “brought no important difference against our business.” To reduce our dependent, “Canada’s economy is not required in an internal re-establishment of the Canadian economy, perhaps the federal and regional governments perhaps to provide accumulated governments.”

One of these factors for Canadian business compensation is easy, if someone is easy, someone now did. Indeed, in the University of St. Francis Xavis Xavis XVIS XVIS XVIS XVIS XVIS XVIS XVIS XVIS XVIS XVIS XVIS.

Canada says that she is doing multiple independent free business agreements with fellow workers from the United States.

“The tire that hit the road, to share trade companies, especially small and medium businesses, and truly serious efforts to listen to the capital on these business agreements.

If I were one thing from the third option if I were something in business, I would really say that I have to try to connect Canadian businesses to other businesses and government agencies to other businesses and government agencies. “

It can still be real about what it is still possible. Even the American, American, will be the most important market and security source in Canada. “The third option, to reduce vulnerability in Canada, is only guided by” reducing vulnerability to reduce vulnerability in the United States.

But in 1972, that was an option. In 2025, it may feel like the need.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *