Since he was founded in 19488, the Prime Minister of Israel has tried to release the Legisi – some through war, some people through diplomacy and some through historical mistakes. David Ben-Gurui gained the state’s independence and created its infrastructure. Her office under the chairmanship of Golda Mir had to pay. While expanding illegal colonies, Mainkum started signing peace with Egypt. Yitzaka Rabin was assassinated for trying to make peace with the Palestine people.
Each leader left his mark to some extent. But no one ruled as Benjamin Netanyahu – or to split. And now, the question is, what kind of legacy he wants to leave, but he is really creating a legacy.
In 2016, I Argued The Arab world effectively crown Netanyahu “King of the Middle East” – which is the title that reflects his success as a regional power without giving Palestine people. Today, I believe it is not only to combine those degrees, but also the opportunity to permanently change in the regional position of Israel – through a strategy with power, penalty and securitized dominated domination.
After his first tenure, Netherahu insisted that the security of Israel should consider all other matters. In his global view, the state of Palestine is not only inconsistent with the safety of Israel; This is a risk of existence. Even such a state was created, Netanyahu has made it clear that Israel called “security sovereignty” on all historical Palestine.
It was never just rhetoric. It has shaped each of his big decisions, rather than the current Gaza war. The attack has equivalent to the entire neighborhood, killing thousands of Palestine people, displaced most of two million people and created unprecedented humanitarian disasters.
Israel has been accused of the Human Rights Group and the United Nations agency of war crimes, ethnic cleaning and genocide. The international court has faced the massacre fees supported by multiple countries. The International Crime Court has issued a arrest warrant for war crimes against humanity and humanity against Humanity, including the use of hunger to Netanyahu and his former Defense Minister Yovan Galant as a war weapon.
Yet Netanyahu is pressuring that Ghaza should never risk Israel again and destroying the future of the country.
This logic does not stop at Gaza. He has used the same arguments to justify the Israeli attacks on Lebanon, in which the target ends on the statistics of Hizbullah and the group leader Hasan Nasalla have tried to assassinate Hasan Nasalla.
Using the same argument, Israel has also started a strike in Yemen, and it has explained that whenever and wherever it seems, it will work in Iraq.
Security arguments have been used to prove the justification of continuous business in the province of Syrian province, and has been requested to legalize the ongoing attacks on Iran and clearly from obtaining nuclear weapons and reducing its missile and drone capacity.
In each case, the same story is repeated: until Israel can be safe unless its enemy breaks, its contraction is not uncontrollable and its dominance is unquestionable. All disagreements, disagreements or resistance – military, political or even symbolic – are thrown as a risk of eliminating.
Even Netanyahu’s diplomatic efforts follow this argument. Abraham agreements signed with the UAE, Bahrain and Morocco during your premiere, were welcomed as a peaceful deal, but they mainly serve as a regional alignment tool that is neglected to Palestine. For Netanyahu, generalization is not a way of peace – this is a way to cement Israel’s status while avoiding a business justification.
So, what is the legacy of Netanyahu?
He wants to remember him as the Prime Minister who crushed all resistance to the business, ended the idea of the Palestine state permanently, and forced Israel to dominate Israel in the Middle East. In his view, Israel controls the land, commands the rules, and answers anyone.
But history may remember him differently.
Netanyahu, which is called security, looks at the most part of the world as an increasingly systematic violence. World response to the war on Gaza – millions of people protest, international legal action, increasing boycott and diplomacy – indicating that Israel has not lost legalities in his leadership.
Even among his allies, Israel faces increasing isolation. While the United States providing diplomat homepage, terms such as “apartheid”, “ethnic cleaning” and “settlement colony” are no longer limited to activeness. They are entering the mainstream political discourse and shaping public consciousness, especially in young generations.
Many commentators argue that Netanyahu is only sticking to power to pay a lawsuit for corruption or liability for attacks on Israel on October 7, 2023. But I believe this analysis misses a deeper truth: that he sees this moment – this war, the absence of responsibility – as a historical window of opportunity. He has a legacy in his mind.
The tragedy is that while pursuing this heritage, he can achieve the opposite of what he does. Not a strong Israel, but more different. Not a safe birthday, but a state viewed as a violation of international criteria. Not a legacy of power, but a moral and political collapse.
Netanyahu will be remembered. Today, when Gaza Burn and Iran are facing strike after the end, there is no doubt. The only question is whether his heritage is one of the national security or the more lonely leaving the Israeli, the more protests and more uncertain than the past.
The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and it is not necessary to reflect al -Jazir’s editorial role.
