A federal judge has dismissed Blake LivelyClaims against the PR expert on social networks Jed Wallace like his legal battle with Justin Baldoni Continue.
According to the court documents obtained by Use weeklyJudge Lewis Liman He granted Wallace’s motion to dismiss -as a defendant in the case without prejudice.
The judge cited the lack of jurisdiction in his decision to launch Wallace and his street relationship relations, noting that he is in Texas and not in New York, where Lively’s demand was filed.
According to his opinion obtained by UsThe judge wrote that “the alleged negative advertising campaign against Animades was largely outside New York. The few alleged actions aimed at New York were taken by others, and there are no allegations that suggest (Wallace is) aware of them. Therefore, Wallace) cannot be forced to defend this demand in New York.”
Blake Lively pledged to continue to “defend” women’s rights as he broke his silence over Justin Baldoni’s demand against his removal. “Last week, I was proud of with 19 organizations united in the defense of women’s rights to talk about their safety,” Lively, 37, wrote through his Instagram history on Monday, June 9. “So (…)
In response to the sentence, Lively’s team said that the actress “respects” the last sentence.
“Lively respects the court’s decision, which has nothing to do with the merit of his allegations of Mr. Wallace’s role in the Frotis campaign and is only related to the procedural issue of whether he is subject to New York jurisdiction or elsewhere,” Lively’s spokesman shared with Lively shared with Lively. Use weekly On Wednesday, July 16.
Use weekly He has contacted the Baldoni team to comment. A Wallace Representative could not be reached for comments.
Blake Lively
Taylor Hill/FilmmagicLively has until Thursday, July 31, present a modified complaint or Sue Wallace in a different jurisdiction.
Animated and Baldoni Legal drama started in December 2024 when the actress accused her Ends with us Cost and director of sexual harassment, creating a hostile work environment and creating with an intention a campaign of a smear against it.
Lively then sued Baldoni, his advertising team and a number of other defendants, and claimed that he was retaliated against sexual harassment allegations.
Justin Baldoni does not lean on his legal battle with us, he ends with us, the cost of Blake Lively after his demand against her and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, were dismissed. “Ms. Lively and the predictable victory statement of her team is false, so let’s be clear about the last sentence,” said Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman, told us (…)
Baldoni firmly denied allegations and counted Lively. In June, however, a judge dismissed his demand Against the actress.
Lively claimed that Wallace was hired because he is engaged in “non -traceable” campaigns on social media platforms. She also stated that she was hired to “arm a digital army” to “create, sow, manipulate and advance unpleasant content.”
In February 2025, Wallace sued Lively for slander after she appointed her company in her California civil rights complaint, presented in December 2024. She is looking for at least $ 7 million and a court order indicating that she was not engaged in harassment or retaliation against the actress.
