California’s challenge to the Trump administration Military deployment A brief hearing was held after the appeals court filed the president on Friday in Los Angeles Donald Trump Critical program victory.
U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer delayed issuing any other rulings, instead asking for briefings from both sides by noon Monday to see if troops are prohibited from violating military enforcement on U.S. land in Los Angeles.
The hearing took place on the second day 9th Circuit Appeal Panel Allow the President Stay in control The National Guard troops he deployed were in response to protests from immigration attacks.
California State Government Gavin Newsom “It is about to violate the Posse Comitatus Act, even if it has not been done yet,” he said in the complaint, but last week Breyer delayed the charge.
Marine Veteran Vice President JD Vance traveled to Los Angeles Friday to meet with troops, including the U.S. Marines deployed to protect federal buildings.
According to Vance, the court determined that Trump’s determination to send federal forces was “legal” and he would do it again if necessary.
“The president has a very simple advice for everyone in every city, every community, every town, if you enforce your own laws, if you protect your own laws, if you protect federal law enforcement, we won’t send the National Guard because it’s unnecessary,” Vance told reporters after he toured the federal complex in Los Angeles.
Vance visited the Federal Joint Operations Center and Mobile Command Center, which followed the demonstrations sometimes after violent clashes between protesters and police and the outbreak. Vandalism And after an immigration raid in Southern California earlier this month. Since June 8, thousands of people have also marched peacefully in Los Angeles.
The National Guard has been accompanying federal agents on some immigration attacks and Marines briefly detained a man On the first day of their deployment, to protect the federal building. Federal forces have detained civilians for the first time since deploying to the second largest city in the United States.
Trump allows control of the National Guard
Breyer found Trump illegally acted as California governor opposes activism. However, the appeal decision stopped the judge Temporary restriction order. Breyer asked a lawyer Friday to resolve whether he or the Court of Appeal retains primary jurisdiction to impose an injunction under the POSSE COMITATUS Act.
California seeks a preliminary ban that allows Newsom to control troops in Los Angeles, and protests have calmed down the protests in recent days.
Republican Trump argued that the necessary condition for restoring order is a necessary condition for restoring order. Democrat Newsom said their presence on the streets of American cities usurped local authorities and wasted resources.
Los Angeles mayor raises curfew after protest
Demo It seems to be endingalthough dozens of protesters appeared on Thursday Dodger Stadiuma group of federal agents gathered in a parking lot, covered their faces and traveled in SUVs and vans. The Los Angeles Dodge organization asked them to leave, and they did.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass on Tuesday Lift downtown curfew This was when the crowds gathered against the gathering of agents detained by immigrants, which was initially implemented for vandalism and clashes with police.
Trump is known as Title 10 under the federalized member of the California National Guard.
When “invasion or insurgency or rebellion against government authority) or the president cannot “enforce American laws,” the president allows the president to call the National Guard to federal service when “invasion” the country “invasion.”
Breyer discovered this Trump surpasses his legal authorityThis allows the president to control the National National Guard only when there is a “rebellion or rebellion danger.”
“The protests in Los Angeles are far from ‘rebellion’,” Watergate Attorney Breyer wrote.
National Guard stays in the hands of the Federation as the lawsuit proceeds
The Trump administration argues that the court cannot make a second guess on the president’s ruling. The Appeals Panel ruled that there was another ruling that the president did not seize control of the state guards, but the panel said in the case that the Trump administration cited protesters’ violence and presented enough evidence to show that it had a reason to defend the forces to bring the federal government.
Currently, as the lawsuit proceeds, the California National Guard will remain in the hands of the federal government. This was the first deployment of the state National Guard president as the dispatched troops were sent to protect civil rights movement marchers in 1965.
Trump celebrated the appeal ruling in social media posts, calling it a “big victory” and hints at more potential deployments.
For his part, Newsom also warned that if Trump goes on his way, California will not be the last state for the forces on the streets.
