Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decision to launch a termination against Iran’s nuclear facilities has created concern among experts in some parts of the global community, at risk of nuclear energy regulator and nuclear contamination.
On Monday, the United Nations Nuclear Watchtog chief Rafael Groosi said that radiological and chemical contamination is likely to cause radiological and chemical contamination since Iran’s main nuclear hub damaged.
Meanwhile, regional and global leaders warned that the Israeli ends, which started on Friday, could cause further volatility in the region and increase the chances of nuclearism.
European Union Foreign Policy Chief Kaja Kallas expressed his “deeper concern” on Saturday. The European Union has opposed the possession of Iran’s nuclear weapons, but believes that “diplomacy, military action” is a way to achieve it, she said.
As nuclear discussions between Washington and Tehran were underway, Nee Netanyahu, who attacked Iran’s nuclear site, started an unprecedented end.
US President Donald Trump has said that his country is not involved in attacks but promised that he will not allow Tehran to take nuclear weapons. Iran has insisted that its nuclear achievement is for the purpose of civilian.
In the month of Israel’s attacks, two nuclear neighbors-India-India neighbors and Pakistan have strongly attacked the Zaporizia nuclear power project in May and Russia and Ukraine.
What did IAEa say?
Addressing the urgent session of the Governor’s Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna on Monday, Groce said that another external radiation level in the Natanz nuclear installation and Isfahan appears in the Israeli strike.
However, the IAEA’s Director General warned that the army grows “increases the possibility of radiological release”. Groce was on Friday that the United Nations Security Council had told the United Nations Security Council that destroyed the upper part of the Israeli ends on the Natanz. The underground main centrifugus facility was not hit, but the attack lost its power.
From this he warned that the underground centrifuges that enriched uranium may have been damaged. Spinning centrifuges contain a gas called uranium hexophaloraide and the gas is the biggest risk of chemical contamination at Natanz at the moment, Groce said. The gas is made by combining uranium and fluorine and is extremely unstable and corrupt. It can burn the skin and can be fatal if breathing. It is unclear whether any of these gas has escaped from centrifugs due to the loss of electricity.
“In this challenging and complex situation, it is important to get timely and regular technical information about the facilities and their related sites,” said Groce. In the absence of that information, he said, the IAEE “cannot accurately assess the radiological conditions and potential consequences on the population and the environment.”
Is the nuclear facility hit?
Al Jaizira did not find the record of an operational nuclear installation in the attack, but power plants have often been attacked during the construction – mainly the Middle East.
In 1980 in a week of the Iran-Iraq war, Iran’s Operation Scorch sword damaged Iraq’s incomplete oscillator in the world’s first attack on the nuclear power plant.
Next year, Israel launched another air attack and destroyed the French-bilt reactor in the Operation Opera. The decades later, the US Operation Dyser Storm attacked the Tuvita Atomic Research Center, one of which was Oserrak.
Iraq also attacked and damaged the incomplete nuclear reactor of Iran in Bushr during the Iran-Iran War. The Soviet Union finally completed the nuclear reactor in the early 2000s and was executed in 2009.
Israel recently Manifest In 2007, he bombed the Syrian nuclear reactor, which is believed to be part of the career of Bashar Al-Asad, President of Nuclear to get nuclear weapons. The outside operation of the box bombed the North Korean-made Plumonium reactor and was destroyed.
Other nuclear reactors have been attacked by political action for security reasons.
Spain’s Bask Stepperitious Group bombed the nuclear power station in Lemoise on the northern coast of Spain. The ATA exploded a bomb inside the facility in 1978 and 1979 and three workers were killed. The Chief Engineer of the project was murdered twice. Spain finally left the project in 1983 after the Francisco Franco Decatership’s nuclear program was canceled.
In 198 2, the anti -energy activists damaged incomplete energy projects. In France they flown in five rocket-insidious grenades Craze-scored Create a hole in the plant near Leone, the wall of its outer concrete.
In December of that year, the African National Congress started a series of four stagmed bombs here Cobberg Separate Energy Station, South Africa’s apartheid government building near Cape Town. The first of the two reactor in the plant was started to operate this month. No injuries or radiation leaks.
Have you ever come close to the world’s nuclear incident?
Dan Smith, head of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, said in an interview to Al Jazir that the use of accidental nuclear weapons was at risk for the world.
In the past, the risk is mainly caused by the wrongdoing of the wrong method.
Smith said, “When we had open information to show that we were very close to the disaster, Petrov’s incident in September 198.3 – He refused to report the false alarm in the Soviet warning system,” Smith said.
Stanislav Petrov, who worked at the Moscow’s early warning command center, started a US ballistic missile against Russia, and then four more satellite information.
The United States objected to deploying the Russian SS20 missiles with multiple warheads, and the superpower was a great tension, and Moscow objected to deploying the Pershing II nuclear missiles deployed in Western Europe.
Petrov may have avoided the nuclear war waiting for Petrov to confirm the evidence before he was forgotten. Any missile was found in Russian soil and Soviet satellite information appeared to be defective.
Recently, during the four -day military struggle between India and Pakistan, India blown its neighboring Brahmos missiles in his neighborhood. While the missilers have done traditional pelod in this case, some experts believe that they can also be improved to carry nuclear warheads.
And former Pakistan Defense Minister Khumar Dastagiri Khan told Al Jazir in May: “Once the missile is in the air, we do not know what pays it without reaching the target.”
In such cases, the risk of nuclear war increases in which in the case of Russia and NATO in Europe – nuclear armed, Smith said.
He said that he is more concerned about “somewhere in the back of time, in the background of the command of the command, in the background, in the background,” rather than any planned nuclear attack.
“Someone sees something and they say,” This is a big attack. This attack is coming. It is the Six 75 missile and their warheads, as we have predicted in your exercise six months ago, and we have to destroy their remaining power so that they will not grow. ” ‘
Is the Russia-Yukran war also added to the risks?
March March 7, after the seizure of the Zaporizia Atomic Energy Project (ZNPP), Russia’s Ukraine invasion of Ukraine, feared a recent nuclear contamination. ZNPP has six nuclear reactors, and they stand on the left edge of the Dnipro River, which is in the middle of the Ukrainian Force.
Ukraine said Russia had placed 500 soldiers with military equipment, tanks and ammunition in the engine room of the first nuclear unit and stopped access to fire extinguishers.
The Russian outpost also opened fire across the Dnipro in Nikopol, openly a revenge fire.
On August 1, 2022, the then US State Secretary Antony Blinkan told the UN General Assembly: “Russia is now using this plant as a military base, they know that they cannot react to nuclear or radioactive garbage again.
Two days later, Ukraine’s state nuclear power agency Enagoatam said that Russian troops blown in the rockets and artillery energy projects and damaged its nitrogen-oxygen station. “Hydrogen leakage and sputting of radioactive substances are at risk. The risk of fire is high,” said Angoatom.
The IAEA finally brought down all six nuclear reactors and intervened to ensure that the hostility around the plants was closed, but the plant still requires water and electricity supply to the cold cost fuel rods and reactors.
