New Delhi participated in the 1960’s Transbound Agreement after 26 people were killed in Kashmir in April.
India will never restore Covenant Federal Home Minister Amit Shah said that the neighboring Pakistan and the water flowing there will be diverted for use.
In April, 26 people were killed in Kashmir in April.
Pakistan rejected the participation in the incident, which led to the day of fighting the two nuclear power – their worst military growth in the decades and brought them to the edge of another war.
Despite the two nations last month, Shah said that his government would not restore the agreement. Access to the guarantee water Three rivers in India in Pakistan’s percent percentage of farms.
“It will never be restored,” Shah told the Times of India newspaper in an interview on Saturday.
“We will construct a water canal flowing in Rajasthan to Pakistan. Pakistan is hungry for water or it is fearlessly happening.”
The transbound water agreement allows both countries to share water flowing through the Indus Kho in, which controls India of three East Himalayas – Ravi, Sutlej and Bes, while Pakistan took possession of the three West rivers – Jhelum, Chenab and Indus.
This agreement established the Indo-Pakistan Indus Commission, which will solve any of the problems that arise. So far, this has been the previous armed conflict between India and Pakistan in the last 65 years.
However, the comments of the most powerful minister Shah in Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s cabinet have slowed the hopes of Islamabad to negotiate the agreement in the near future.
Pakistan has not yet responded to Shah’s comments. But it has previously stated that this agreement does not have the provision to pull one -sided back on one side and to block some of them The river water Walking to Pakistan .He will be considered a “the action of war.”
Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishant Dar said last month, “This agreement cannot be amended, or if both of them do not agree, it cannot be terminated by any party.”
According to international law, Islamabad is also a legal challenge to India’s decision in India’s decision.
Legal experts told Al Jazzir in April that the agreement could not be suspended one -sided and it can only be modified by mutual agreements between the parties.
Pakistani lawyer Ahmar Bilal Sufi told Al Jezira, “India has used the word ‘ebayens’ and has no provision in this agreement.” It also violates the promotion of the upper and lower Kiparian -related international laws, where the upper Kiparian cannot stop the promise of water for the Kiparian. “
Political analyst in New Delhi, Anuti Banerjee, in April, told Al Jazir that the agreement could continue, but not in the present form.
Banerjee said, “Instead, it will be” Repeat “and” Review “and” Changes ” – three meanings different things – considering new challenges such as groundwater loss and climate change in the original contract,” Banerjee said.
