Israeli and the United States are using words that are involved in a growing struggle with Iran, who feels very familiar with the Iraq war.
“Today we have a great power to break a dangerous and aggressive rule. We can achieve military objectives without giving new tactics and accurate weapons to the citizens.”
It will feel like something Said Yesterday, following the US strike on Iran.
But that was not.
The word was given by US President George W Bush on May 1, 2003 on the board at the USS Abraham Lincoln.
Now, Israel and the United States are involved in growing work Conflict With Iran, global leaders are using language and rhetoric that all seem familiar with, and two decades ago, the Iraq war leads to the leading front.
Familiar warning, similar justification
Israel and the United States have claimed that their military strike is aimed at preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons. Iran, for its part, its atomic program is completely peaceful and insists that it is only for civil purposes.
More than three DecadesIsraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been a familiar discourse: Iran is on the verge of developing nuclear weapons. In 9, he urged the US Congress to attack Iraq and claimed that Baghdad was developing weapons of collective destruction (WMD). He claimed that Iran was pursuing nuclear weapons. The United States attacked Iraq in 2003, but WMDs were not found.
The latest growth of inflammatory rhetoric by American and Israeli officials is beyond Iran’s alleged nuclear ambitions and missile capabilities. To a ratio, this indicates the possibility of the possibility The change of governance, The United States has a long and controversial history of pursuing this region in that direction.
Repeat history?
The United States and his “Alliance” led by the war with the war left in the remains of Iraq Hundreds of thousands Almost of the Iraqi people, 500 American soldiers died and the country became volatile by increasing communal conflict.
Looking back, the rhetoric that frees the path of that invasion seems uncomfortable. With the United States, with the United Kingdom, Iraq tried to convince the world that WMD was progressing.
How good can you tell the difference? Read and decide these 10 statements: Was it at the forefront of the 2003 war or in 2025?
