In Wednesday Privacy Privacy Published, CEO Google CEO EXICY Wang Clock, and Center for Manhattan style intelligence to develop AI’s intelligence to “superhuman”, also known as Agri.
The paper, with the titles “Exintellijen Superintelligence Strategy“Association of an aggressive offer by the US to control speciali AI SUPERINTIGENT systems can be quick to withdraw from China, which can be carbbing the international relationship.
“(A) Project Manhattan (for AGI) assumes that the competitors will be able to estimate or omnikidies of moving instead of moving,” Co-authors say. “What starts as push for superwapon and global control risk and risk of countermeasures that become countermeasures and tensions are very fast for stability.”
Co-authors with three figures in the influence on the American Ai Industry, the paper is only a few months after a US Congress Commission proposed ‘Manhattan Project Style’ Efforts to finance the development of AGI, are dicided after American Atomic Program in 1940s. Secretary US Energy Chris Wright recently said that we are in “Beginning of New Manhattan Project“On AI at the front of the supercompail site along the opening of Greg Brockman.
The Surintelimjen’s strategy structure challenge of ideas, fruit for some American policy and industry leaders in the past month, that the government-based program is the best way to compete with China.
In my opinion of Schmidt, Wang, and Hendrycks, the US is in a dissimilar bulk standoff Listen to an objectiveSee rankings-. In the same way, the global power does monopol in the nuclear weapon – which can strike preemptive strikes from enemies – Schmidt and the authors should be careful about a strong army race.
While enjoying the AI system for nuclear weapons may sound, the world leader has considered AI to become the highest military advantage. Already, in Pentagon says AI helps out the chain to kill the militarySee rankings-.
Schmidt et al. Identify the concepts called wrongly guaranteed (maim), where the government may turn off the AI project that threatens the enemy.
Schmidt, Wang, and HendrykKking propose that we focus focus from “win races to superintelligence” to develop a method that Tore another country from making superinteligent AI. The co-translator writer must “zoom
The author of the co-authority identifies the belled in the world of Ai policy. There is “doomenrs,” believe that the disaster aspects of the ai’s development is a conclusion and advocate foregone and supported for the most forward countries. On the other hand, there is a “ostriced,” who believes the state needs to speed up ai and actually just hope.
The paper proposes the third method: the approach measured to develop aggment of defensive strategy priority.
The strategy is mainly coming from Schmidt, who has previously vocating the US needs to be aggressive with China in developing AI advanced systems. Just a few months ago, Schmidt publishes the OP-ed DeepSeek signals the turn in the American A ‘race with China.
The trumpest administration seems to die off in america ai ai ai. However, as co-author records, American decisions around AGI is not in vacuum.
As the world watches Americans push the AI limit, Schmidt and the rule show might be wiser to take a defensive approach.
