President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance have posted on social media that the United States has planned to participate in the struggle between Israel and Iran, and Trump has raised the possibility of violence in Iran’s leadership.
Tuesday’s first posts came from Vans, who wrote a long mistake by blaming Iran to prevent the handling of the conflict and to continue Iran’s nuclear prosperity program.
“The President has made it clear that Iran could not enrich uranium. And he repeatedly said that it would be one of the two ways- an easy way or ‘second’ way,” van. Written??
The Vice President went on to explain what the “other way” could look.
Vans said, “The President has focused on the protection of his army and protecting his citizens.” He can decide that he needs to take further action to end the Iranian conservation. This decision is in the end of the President. “
Trump extended himself in less than one hour. On their true social platform, the President had threatened and threatened by the President of Iran, the top leader of Iran. Called For the “unconditional surrender” of the country.
Trump Trump Written??
“It’s a simple goal, but there is safe there – we will not take him out (hit!), At least not now. But we don’t want missiles on citizens or American soldiers. Our restraint is thin.”
These two messages have come up as Iran and Israel continued to exchanged missile fire, experts feared the outbreak of a broad regional war.
That prospect has raised questions about whether the US can join.
Trump has already indicated that he had earlier knowledge of Israel’s initial attack on Israeli’s June 3 June, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has filed a petition against Iran’s military campaign.
Nevertheless, the Trump administration has placed some distance between itself and Israel, a long -time associate.
The first attack was launched by Israel, US State Secretary Marco Rubio issued Statement Saying Israel’s actions “one -sided” and the United States emphasized “not joining the strike against Iran”.
Shifting tone
However, critics have estimated that Trump is slowly creating a case for the United States in the US struggle.
The last days of the bombing, the US and Iran were involved in several months of negotiations to restrict the nuclear program of Iran. Another round of discussion was fixed last week, but it was canceled in the increasing violence.
The United States has since replaced warships and military aircraft in the region called “protection of American army”.
US Defense Secretary Pete Hazseth said in AA, “The purpose of these deployments is intended to increase the defensive posture of the region.” Statement??
In the meantime, Trump has established this conflict due to the desire to reduce Iran’s nuclear program. While he was flying home from a group of Seven (G7) in Canada, he again thought that Iran had lost a chance to avoid conflict.
Trump told reporters, “They should make this agreement. I told them: ‘Make a contract’. So I do not know. I’m not much in the mood of negotiations. ”
Iran has been denied a long time to find nuclear weapons. But it is feared that it can develop someone, the tensions of the United States, Israel and other countries have increased for decades.
In 2015, Iran signed an agreement to recover their nuclear program with the US, China, Russia, France, Germany, the United Kingdom and the European Union in exchange for approval. But in 2018, in his first tenure, Trump withdrew the United States from a contract, and he was crushed.
He has since followed the “maximum pressure” policy on Iran and other enemies of the United States. He has continued this campaign in the second term.
In March, for example, Trump Blames Iran For the attacks of Yemen’s Hathi rebels, “Iran will be held responsible and the consequences will have to be achieved and its consequences will be terrible!”
A nuclear question
Those threats Has expressed concernEven in Trump’s Make America Great Again (Mag) base, the United States can once again get stuck in an expensive foreign war.
On Friday, for example, Takar Carlson Network – led by Upstiming conservative commentator – Sent the morning newspaper Lobbing against the United States involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict.
“If Israel wants to do this war, then it is the right to do so. It is a universal country and can do it as desired. But not with the support of the United States,” the newspaper reads.
The MPs have also shifted to prevent any possible participation of the United States in the dispute.
On Tuesday, Republican Kentucky’s US representative Thomas Messi joined in California’s democratic colleague Row Khanna Declaration They will submit a bill called Iran War Power Resolution, so that the President should ask for the approval of the Congress before participating in the conflict.
Just a day ago, a member of the Democratic Senate Tim Cain Unveiled A similar bill. He would have directed the President to “the use of American armed forces against Iran for hostility”.
The Trump administration, however, emphasizes its position that getting Iran is a red line that cannot be exceeded. The White House on Tuesday a Statement Trump has been linked to dozens of comments, emphasizing that “never hesitated” in his position.
However, critics have pointed out that Trump has opposed some members of the Board under his own, who doubt the possibility of Iran to have a nuclear weapon.
In March, for example, Tulsi Gabard, director of the National Intelligence, testified to the Congress that the United States was evaluating that the United States did not create an Iran nuclear weapon and did not authorize the suspended nuclear program suspended by Supreme leader Khmani in 2003.
During the night flight to the United States, Trump rejected Gabard’s assessment. “I don’t care about what she said. I think they are very close to it,” he told reporters.
Gabard has since said that his own comments are in line with the presidency.
But the Trump administration’s contradictory statements have raised questions about Iran – and the military investment in the Middle East – how to change this week.
Advoci Group MPO’s Change Action Fund’s statement and political director Yasmin Taib noted that Gabard’s Congress witness represented the conclusions of the entire US intelligence community.
“It is just blasphemous and surprisingly disqualified that Trump does not rely on his own intelligence guidance,” she told Al Jazir.
Jamal Abdi, the president of the Think Tank and Political Group, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), told Al Jazir that Trump’s comments raised questions about sources dependent on information.
“It really makes it clear that this is a war of choice,” he told Al Jazir. “If he does not listen to his own intelligence community, who is hearing it? Is this Netanyahu?”
“When I say that at least (former US president) George W Bush started his endless war, he had the reputation of lying on the WMDS (weapons of collective destruction),” said Abdi, who helped start the US attack on Iraq in 2003.
“Donald Trump is just saying: ‘I don’t care about what the facts are. We say so.”
