Does a month of Ukraine’s work truce?


Can a partial month-long truce between Russia and Ukraine the key to opening a lasting peace between both sides?

President Emmanuel Macron in France believed that and he was crucified the idea of ​​Sunday Sunday with European leaders in London.

In an interview with the Le Figaro newspaper, he suggested four-weeks of domesticity “in the air, at sea and energy infrastructure”. It is not covered with the ground fight in front of the east line.

“If there is a stop stop, it is very difficult to determine (a truce) in front of the front respected,” Macron told the newspaper.

In a separate interview, Forres Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot says: “Such an Air, the Russian infrastructure Vladimir Putin acts on a trucation. And that can be the start of a trucation.”

This is up to now see more of an idea than a perfect work plan and hard details lacking. But the essence of hypothesis seems to divide the process of ending fight.

An initial momentary truce – something less permanent than a formal stop – give a chance to test Russia’s willingness to negotiate with a peace. It is also possible to provide an early political victory for President Trump.

It does not include any ceding in the territory. And it can make political space to allow serious talks to start about a lasting peace.

Under the French proposal, a European assurance “European” deploying Ukraine to avoid Russia’s invitation after any lasting ceasefire agreed.

The Ambassador of Britain in Washington, Lord Mandelson, showing trust in the essence of Sunday in a talks with ABC News when he said: “Ukraine should first speak in a ceasefire and reject the Russians to follow. “

But Monday Monday officials in the UK government are cool about French truce idea and highlighted that it is not yet agreed to suggestion. The armed forces Luke Pollard said the current BBC program: “There are many options mentioned at the moment. Nothing agreed at this stage”.

The Prime Minister’s spokesman says: “Really have a lot of options on the table. I just don’t get a running commentary on choices.”

The Deputy Prime Minister of Italy and Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani is more violent, saying that the idea is “premature”, according to Italian News Agency Ansa.

“I believe everyone should do, Europe and the United States, sitting at a table with Ukraine and Russia to reach a fair peace,” says Tajani. “Therefore, it is still expected to see what to do, how to do it.”

Have clear difficulties with the idea. How is a measure of a violation of an anonymous drone attack in a plant power in Ukraine? Why do Ukraine want to give Russian forces a free month of regroup and rearm?

But for all Western diplomatics said the idea of ​​a partial truce is not completely “blue skies thinking” by President Macron – a man known to the floating ideas of international summit.

They say this part of the european stop-stop plans have been enjoyed before placing Americans.

It is obvious that new thinking may be necessary to open the current US and Ukraine’s impact on difficulties and Europeans have difficulty recovering diplomatic violations.

All courses depend on what Ukraine and Russia thinks. On Sunday night the President Sunday Voltodmyr Zelensky was asked if he knew the French Truce Plan and said simple: “I know everything.”

So far no evidence The Russians are willing to agree to a partial truce. As Zelensky said: “Anyone who wants to negotiate accidentally hit people with a ballistic missile.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *