Bonnie Blue talks after only the prohibition on the Challenge Zoo Prohibition


Bonnie Blue You have fun with your “Zoo” event while visiting an animal habitat.

In a photo shared through its Instagram history on Monday, June 23, Blue arrived at the fence to touch the top of an animal’s head. “Petting zoo wasn’t that bad,” he wrote about the picture.

In a history of tracking another Instagram account, Blue threw a skin in a pig through the pen. “Hazardous activities at Petting Zoo,” he added.

The Blue Load comes days after completing its “Petting Zoo” challenge on June 15, where it would be detached and tied to a glass box. Blue said he was expecting Complies with its current record and sleep with 2,000 men at the event. At the end of this month, speculation revolved that Blue had been banned on the adult content platform.

Bonnie's blue jokes

Bonnie Blue Courtesy of Bonnie Blue/Instagram

The content of “extreme challenge” is not only available to fans and is not allowed by our acceptable use policy and service terms, “a spokesman said Use weekly In a statement. “Any breach of our service conditions results in the deactivation of content or account.”

If the content violates the only terms of the service, the subscription -based platform does not allow creators to suggest that it could be located there. Only fans will act when users violate their terms of service.

Blue then broke his silence, saying -in the UK Daily star That the “unprecedented” platform “had to ban it for” to “do content, while several creators mimic my marketing techniques and events”.

“They considered my” dangerous “content, although I am the only person who creates this content that has never made public statements about the end of the hospital, due to the creation of non -safe environments,” he said in a statement. “I have not publicly explained my sadness due to these events, unlike others that are allowed to stay.”

Was Bonnie Blue been banned only to violate the terms of service with the kick of the zoo?


Related: Was Bonnie Blue been banned only to violate the terms of the service?

Days after Bonnie Blue completed his challenge “Zoo Petting”, he reported that the creator was only banned in mothers. The content of “extreme challenge” is not only available to fans and is not allowed under our acceptable use policy and service terms, “said a spokesman for Us Weekly in a statement.” Any breach of our terms (…)

She continued: “The main difference between me and others, I am more successful and I do not cry or bleed after my events, as I understand my body and my limits.” (Blue seems to be throwing shadow to companions only creators Lily phillips and Annie Knightwho participated in his own challenges of “competitive sex” and cried and ended in a hospital then respectively.)

Blue stated that he had precautions in his place, including checks with identification scanners and consent forms. The creator stated that she provides participants “condoms, drinks and free materials to hide their identities to the public if they choose.”

“My content was considered” dangerous “, but if I was banned from this, it calls into question the authenticity of the platform, since no other creator had the same treatment,” he said. “From using minor children to promote only fans, to content that should be banned on the platform.”

She continued: “I think only creators or creators do not matter to them, but only press articles and public pressure. If I did not have the platform I have for the hard work I have done, I do not think they had abused a eyelid, as shown with all these other creators.”

Blue claimed that the platform has “a problem more” with its sleep with “barely legal” than “using children to promote my content instead.”

Why do creators only speak against Bonnie Blue?


Related: Why do creators only speak against Bonnie Blue?

Only Fans Star Bonnie Blue is in the center of a new debate within the industry: Where do the creators have to draw the line with stunts? Blue, 26, recently made headlines when he shared a video stating that he had been arrested and apparently staged a fake wedding with a fan, both of which are allegedly part (…)

“They have another problem with me using adults consented to content than the other creators who do what I suppose is the same,” he said. “I have done nothing of the only rule of the line, but other creators may commit more harmful breaches of cough and are fine.”

Blue also stated that he had once received a warning for content he did not hang, claiming that he was confusing for a different creator.

“How can a company that does not know the difference between its own influential is a source of trust to comment on someone’s content?” She said. “The platform has no problem with the content I did, as is clear by using these other influencers as examples. They have a problem with me personally. I was distinguished and used as an example.”

He concluded: “Only fans stated that any breach of their T & C will lead to the deactivation of the account. If so, and they did not discriminate, as the various creators say they also claim the same.”

Use weekly He contacted Blue and Onlyfans for comments.

For more information on the severe risks and potential damage to “competitive sex” and other explicit content, read doctors, mental health professionals and other experts at Us Weekly here.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *