Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni
Getty Images, WireimageIn a new presentation obtained by Use weekly, Blake Lively shot after being accused of trying to ‘prevent the audience from seeing’ relevant evidence ‘in their legal battle against Justin Baldoni.
Following Lively’s recent request for a Improved protection order – who requested a stipulation “only a lawyer” to keep some information outside the eyes of the public during the discovery process, the legal team of Baldoni presented a letter to Judge Lewis Liman On Tuesday, February 25.
“Given the activities that animated parties have published and litigated by Ms. Livelly in the media, we are surprised that they are now learning how vehemently wants to prevent the public from accessing relevant materials and tests,” prosecutor. ” Mitchell Schuster wrote a la carte, for Period.
Schuster accused Lively, 37, and her field Ends with us.
Blake Lively applied for a light protection order and ends the legal battle of the director of the United States, Justin Baldoni. Lively, 37, and husband Ryan Reynolds filed a letter to a judge on Thursday, February 20, Us Weekly can confirm, to ask for a stronger protection order than they granted. (Animated (…)
“Therefore, Mrs. Lively does not have a belief in” good faith “that there is information on such a personal nature that the parties” would unnecessarily violate privacy rights, “the letter continued.
Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni
Courtesy Sony Pictures Ent.Schuster argued that Lively’s request to improve the initial protection order that was previously granted to the legal battle is not “justified”, saying that “the animated parts have not explained and cannot explain why” the court’s protection order is “insufficient”. (The menu also slid toward Ryan Reynoldsthat appeared in a “planned skit” on the dispute during Saturday night liveis recent Special birthday 50th.)
In response, Lively’s lawyer Michael Gottlieb He issued a four -page letter on Tuesday, calling for “the disregard and contempt of the woman who defended the most basic protections of the workplace against sexual harassment” demonstrated by Baldoni and those on his side. By the letter, obtained by UsA protection order is “standard and even expected in the most worldly civil litigation.”
Gottlieb also claimed that “certain online content creators” have been known for “stopping the line of Wayfarer’s parts with” misleading accusations “about Lively’s intentions.
“Travel of embezzlement embraced by the opposition through this manufactured echo chamber, in itself, provide a wide justification for a protection order that establishes appropriate protections for third -party privacy interests,” the letter continued.
Justin Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, has responded strongly to Blake Lively’s request for a gagger in the legal case of the former cost of the filming that ends with us. “The irony is not lost in anyone that Ms. Lively is so petrified in the truth that he has moved to the ghost -la Freedman (…)
Lively appointed Baldoni, who directed and starred in his side Ends with us – In December 2024 Demand for sexual harassmentClaiming Baldoni encouraged a “hostile work environment”. He modified his complaint earlier this month, detailing the emotional impact of the ongoing legal battle.
Baldoni denied Lively’s harassment accusations before fileing demands against The New York Times – The departure that originally published the allegations of Lively and against Lively, Reynolds and his publicist. It Moments has defended his reports recently shouting “inaccuracies” To the legal presentation of Baldoni. Lively and Reynolds, on their parts, have continued to deny Baldoni’s slander claims. (Earlier this month, Lively’s publicist filed a motion to eliminate Baldoni’s demand.)
A first hearing took place on February 3, during which Judge Liman pointed to Date of test of the couple – Set in March 2026: The details of their case could be moved “litigated in the press”.
