In a whistle, former Judge Premier League Chris Foi goes through the choice of key decisions in matches from the latest action in Ski bet Championship, league One and League.
Behind the whistle aims to provide supporters of EFL clubs insight into consideration of decision-making and also clarify certain calls to provide understanding how the laws of games are interpreted.
As part of the regular features on Ski Ski Sports after concluding matches, FOI will be here to start you through some judicial things in EFL …
Sheffield Wednesday-2. 1-2 Sunderland
Incident: Goal has been reached, possible handball (Sunderland)
Decision: Sanderlend Sander
FOI says: “Unfortunately, the judge does not identify that the ball hit the handlelenda # 12 before continuing to achieve goal.
“It is obvious that it is of the auditor that, while the ball s) over the top, the last handlelend attacks. Although it is accidental, the same attacker immediately achieves a hit, which means that the goal must be banned.
“The exact outcome here would be to assign a defensive free kick.”
Birmingham City 1-0 Vicomba Vanderers
Incident: Possible Red Map, Serious Faul Game (Vicombe Vanderers)
Decision: Awarded red card (ViCombe Vanderers)
FOI says: “In my opinion, the judge gets this absolutely in place. As Vicomba Vanderers player encounters and makes a challenge in speed, obviously misses the ball and catches his opponent.”
“It would be a just easy to show a yellow card for the cynical nature of the correction, however, identifies that the accessories meet the threshold for a serious faucle game.
“The challenge has high speed and intensity, therefore, is a good decision to show a red card as if it endangers the safety of the opponent.”
Peterborough United 3-1 Shrewsbury Town
Incident: Possible Red Map, Violent Behavior (City of Shrewsbury)
Decision: Red Map, Violent Behavior (City of Shrewsbury)
FOI says: “While the ball took a long time from the beginning, Shrewsbury is no. 27 raises his hand in his opponent’s neck, which falls on the ground.
“We can see from an angle closely that the arm is raised and seems to catch an opponent by force. The judge must not board the red card, which is at the end the correct decision.”
Cheltenham Town 1-1 Grimsbi Town
Incident: Position, Handball (Cheltenham Town)
Decision: Penalty Awarded (Cheltenham Town)
FOI says: “If you should do the forensic analysis of this incident, it would be clear to everyone that this is an obvious penalty for handball, but I actually think that is a great place of judges in a crowded area.
“While the ball is played in the box, Grimsbi Town’s # 5 has its own hand, is covered with the ball and is contacting the ball. It is in an unnatural and unjustified position, he cannot have complaints at the ceremony.
“For me, the judge deserves praise here as the city of Cheltenham nearby, he goes on his head, right in front of the handball position. With many players in that area, it is good to stay calm and stay calm and on the spot.”










