Open behind the whistle, former Judge Premier League Chris Foi passes through the choice of key decisions in the EFL action match.
Behind the whistle aims to provide supporters of EFL clubs insight into consideration of decision-making and also clarify certain calls to provide understanding how the laws of games are interpreted.
As part of the regular features on Ski Ski Sports after concluding matches, FOI will be here to start you through some judicial things in EFL …
Sunderland 0-1 Hull City
Incident: The aim is achieved, probably in offside (Hull City)
Decision: The aim is forbidden, offside, offsage (Hull City)
FOI says: “Although there is still showing that the shooter of Naked Hull Citi is clearly in the najid guards, it is an excellent real-time decision than judge assistants, given many factors that need to be considered.
“Until the hull golgs move backwards, several captured Sunderland defenses pulled towards the goal line and looks like it can be aside to Sedan, but this is not the case.
“The flag of the Assistant Judge grows and apparently signals the player to return the player from the cropped position to turn on in the active game, so he becomes this video.”
Lincoln City 0-1 Burton Albion
Incident: Possible penalty, Faul (Burton Albion)
Decision: No punishment, Simulations (Burton Albion)
FOI says: “Although the factors like moving speed are important here, the judge absolutely brings the right decision in the presentation of Burton Albion no. 7 Caution for simulation.
“Once the attacker enters the criminal area, light contact from Lincoln City # 23 and falls to the ground. It allows the judge to identify that the contact is enough enough to be able to make it on the ground and therefore assigned defensive free kick. “
Rotherham United 0-1 Barnsley
Incident: Possible penalty, handball (Barnsley)
Decision: No Penal Assigned (Barnsley)
FOI says: “This incident meets all the criteria for handball violations, but unfortunately, the match officials failed.
The “position and movement of the hand from the Rotherham United Defender here are unjustified and comfortably encountered with the threshold on the awarding of the place.
“The Rotherham man raises his hand high, away from the body and almost swing the ball clearly preventing Barnsley from being the ball and therefore the judge should assign a penalty in Barnsley..“
Carlisle United 0-0 Gillingham
Incident: Possible punishment, foul (Gillingham)
Decision: No punishment assigned (Gillingham)
Foys says: “This is the wrong decision of the judge for me. While Gillingham did not go through the goal and touched the touch that passed the” guard, and he can’t stay on his feet.
“Although the contact comes from a true challenge for the ball, there is an unrepresent contact that increases forward and prevents it from exceeding the ball potentially.
“The correct call would be to reward the Gillingham punishment.”
Grimsbi Town 2-1 Fleetwood Town
Incident: Red Map, Dogso (Fleetwood Town)
Decision: No red tickets, feature advantages (Fleetwood Town)
FOI says: “This is difficult for the judge here as it must bring instinctive decision at the moment, in a very quick development of the game phase.
“While Grimsbi Town passes through the goal, he is covered by the Fleetvood City defense counsel, the judge admits and reproduces the advantage, such as another grimsby player through the goal with the aim of only” guard “. However, his blow is preserved.
“At this point, it was too late to return and give a defender red card, as it was not denied the obvious pretty goal for golf. It is frustrating for Grimsby to not even achieve the opponent dismissed , but that is the correct judgment of officials. “