International legal order loses its effectiveness while facing the unilateral of the hedgehony forces as well as the acts of accepting the norms accepted. If such methods remain unknown, it is a danger that the basic purpose of the order will lose: the protection of justice, the peace and the sovereignty of the nations.
The US and Israel’s attack on Iran, which includes targeted murder of scientists and thinkers, bombing on IAEA-accredited nuclear facilities and ends of residential, medical, medium and public infrastructure, is an example of illegal, unilateral action. This is a wrong action and is a clear violation of the basic criteria of international law.
In this regard, the principles of responsibility in the state, which states that the states are responsible for the wrongdoing, must be implemented. The International Law Commission ILC made the state responsibilities for international misconceptions .This principle was made in the article, who has been widely recognized and quoted by international courts and tribunal.
According to their provisions, the Commission of the wrongdoing – such as illegal use of power – violates international duty and imposes a binding duty on the responsible state for the complete and effective repayment of causing harm.
The scope of legal responsibility is beyond the general violation of the US and Israel’s illegal acts. These actions not only violated the formal international law but also violated the highest number of international legal criteria, the perpendicular criteria. Of these, the principle of preventing aggression is a basic and binding rule everywhere. No state is permitted from this general proportion and violators. They promote them. All members of the international community should respond together to support the law.
There are at least two related legal examples that can guide the principle of state responsibility and the restriction of repair in Iran.
In 198, the UN Security Council accepted the resolution 487 in response to the Israeli attack on Iraq’s nuclear facilities. The action of this aggression was essentially featured as “a serious threat to the entire Safegard rule of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAA), which is the foundation for non-transmission of nuclear (NPT). This resolution also fully approved the incredible universal authority of all the states to establish technology and nuclear development programs to develop their economy and industry for peaceful purposes.
In Article in, Article In states that “Iraq has the right to resolve the destruction that Israel has acknowledged the responsibility”. Mandatory that the aggressive victims compensate for the resulting damage, the resolution provides a clear legal example to resolve the same cases.
Thus, the attacks by the United States and Israel were confirmed with the public announcement and considering that they have been well documented, the use of resolution 487 in the Iranian case is not only appropriate and necessary to use the principles and provisions of the Iranian case.
Another relevant document is the NUM Security Council resolution 29, which was adopted in 1999, 1999 and established the United Nations Compensation Commission (UNCC) after the Kuwait attack of Iraq. The Commission was given the process of processing and compensation for the damage to the attack.
The UNCC’s creation showed the ability of the international system to identify the victims, evaluate the loss, and implement practical compensation – set a clear model of state responsibility in case of illegal aggression.
These examples provide a strong legal and organizational basis to firmly strongly express the rights of the Iranian people. Therefore, it is advisable to install a rules-based mechanism like the Commission on International Compensation to Reduce the UN to Iran.
The UN General Assembly or other competent UN organization initiated and recognized should evaluate the loss of the loss of the Xianist rule against Iran due to the illegal and aggressive acts of the United States.
Establishment of a replacing mechanism through a separate commission, factor-filling institution or compensation, which is operating under international observation, will contribute meaningfully to restore trust in the global legal system and will respond to the current generalization of punitive action.
Iran has another way to pursue justice under illegal attacks. On their front, the IAEA published a biased and politically motivated report on the Iranian nuclear program, which made the United States and Israel a commission of aggression and violated the principle of neutrality.
It is in a position to relieve and harm from the agency under section 17 of the IAA Safguards Agreement to Iran. Due to the obvious neglect of the agency, Iran is eligible to bring Iran to Iran, and is eligible to pay full repayment to all physical and moral compensation on peaceful nuclear facilities and scientific employees.
In this regard, pursuing responsibility for the IAA with aggressive states is an important factor of Iran’s comprehensive strategy to maintain responsibility in international legal order. Iran will strongly protect its rights on each platform, depending on the recognized, legal and international system.
The responsibility of the recent crimes of this aggression war is not just on the criminals, the US and Israel and the IAE directly with the help of criminals and those who helped. All the states and international organizations are undeniable obligation to implement effective legal measures to prevent such crimes.
Overall, the international community should respond decisively. In the face of aggression and oppression, peace, delay, any complications of any kind will reduce the empty declaration of state responsibility according to international law.
In the pursuit of responsibility, Iran will end all available resources and do not strive until their people’s rights are fully recognized and they get enough relief. Until this justice is fully achieved, the lawsuit of the offenses responsible for these crimes will continue to be sued and the responsibility of the responsibility.
The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and it is not necessary to reflect al -Jazir’s editorial role.
