Is it too cheeky move to tell the higher England manager, the one who has a great record of the tournament, “he told you?”
Maybe it is. But she remembered 87 minutes of what could only be described as one of the worst performances of the English Sarina Viegman’s, feeling relevant. Only last three minutes (plus time added) can be free from monitoring.
Many England observers, and I am involved selected flaws in Masterplan Long before what happened against France happened. There was a feeling of premonition attached Viegman’s beginning of selection, despite the protests of “readiness”.
Are England robust enough in the middle? Are wide players capable of providing enough service and conceal at the same time? Is Jess Carter the best answer to the left-left? Did Lauren James actually answered?
France recorded three times more punches on the target as England
All reservations are confirmed at half time. England was exceeded, Alessia Russo isolated above, and an attack on the left channel in Lanes, and Carter is an overly exposed tempo with weather delphin cascarino over time and time.
Problems in the middle of the link field were even more shinier. Keira Valsh and Georgia Stanvai – who played only 151 minutes of football from December before this tournament – were not the match for the dynamism of Sakina Karchaoui, Grace Geioro and Oriane Jean-Francois. James, stationed as no. 10, he became lost among the chaos of everything.
Players who know each other well, who together won Euro 2022, they looked like any bite like foreigners who gathered necessary, not the design.
The mistakes were numerous. For the first goal, I count four: Stanvai GiveAway, Carter’s poor positioning, Alex Greenwood’s lack of trying to stop the cross that comes and Leah Williamson’s lack of awareness of where Marie-Antoinette Katoto was. Criticism on the second inclusion is two sharp, because the first phase was especially bad, but everyone played part.
Williamson got up with honest post-match, talking ITV That “cheaply defended one-vs-one” was expensive, and England was not enough on the ball. Beth Mead called her side “Reactive”. “She had no Oomph soon.”
Use Chrome Browser for a more affordable video player
Following the defeat of opening in Euro 2025. in France, Beth Mead questioned how you ruled Ophansed for disabling Alessia Russo, while Jess Carter felt that the lions “did not appear.”
For the second goal, I count three mistakes: Williamson’s inactivity, Bronze’s strange attempt to recover the failure in the goal and from Greenwood, that he may have had a skill (and happiness) to free the defense counsel. A gap for closing the space was too big.
Speak on BBC 5 LIVERecently, Retired England Fran Kirby offered further an honest assessment: “It was very different from the Lionesses team I was used to playing and watching.” And yet, a little, what he felt special surprising. Viegman will do a large homework on the physicals of France, which persistently represents an inefficient environment three to know for an hour to confuse much more.
I don’t enjoy it Raising the same concerns Many other writers worked before the Sabbath Shocker. I just remember to talk about what’s supposed to happen now. What were the fundamental flaws and how are they right correct?
Lucy Bronze remained to think about what went wrong against France
A strong case must be forwarded for Grace Clinton to start starting in front of the apartment. Fully answers, Match Sharp Stanvai is wonderful and creative, but this version just causes the flow of England. Even Ella Toone, in the field, 47 minutes less than the apartment, managed more more progressive beggars (3) in the final third of Stanvai. For context, Walsh was registered in 11. Williamson landed 13 of the central defense.
Clinton proved to be more influential when replacing Stanvaia late in the second half, he coincides with the best magic of England. Its ability to put the ball at risk, acts in narrow areas and plays half turns, all qualities of England are missing. It should be good to get well with Walsh, like a ball bracket, allowing no. 4 to perform its most important function – dictates deeply.
Alex Greenwood and Lea Williamson deals first of many investigative investigations such as England looked to recover from the loss of France
Although Viegman “didn’t see it as a mistake” to start James in any roles, everyone who looked at the game. Rarely, if he ever, whether she looked so visually rattled at the touch line. Again, this is not harmonization in the inevitability of the situation, because James winner of the match and in the past is in the past. But everything was fine here was wrong, that was so obvious.
Can Chelsea Forward – Another Preparation Was Bit Belfond Injurse – better to use or even as an impact? And tons and Jess Park are waiting in the wings.
Another consideration can be rotating on full back, offering Charles chance to continue what it seems to be a promising relationship with Lauren hemp on the left. She denied that England missed the physicism of Millie’s bright against French aggressive press, but the Netherlands plays many more positions, which means that the emphasis on England technically and tactically smart is more important.
Use Chrome Browser for a more affordable video player
On the field to the floor, Nikiti Parris and Jordan Nobbs talk about which Sarina Viegman should start with the beginning of England X for their conflict with the Netherlands and how they move forward in the tournament.
Russo should also be played. She doesn’t want to launch channels – like Aggie Beever-Jones can – so England needs passers-by to be found with regularity. The combination of Chloe Kelly-Russo works for Arsenal, no reason why this connection cannot be transferred to the English attack. The park is also a player who can unlock the defense from the passage of separation.
At least the depth of choice is something Vigman can be blessed. And England still has nothing to decide. The hope of progression was shot, not sheltered.
They have awareness of where they went wrong – now it’s their job to fix it.
