Vimbledon officials were apologized by Anastasia Pavliuchenkov and Sonai Cartyl after a non-compliant fault of the new electronic call system at the Central Court.
After the investigation, the organizers have admitted that the technology was excluded in the game court error, and the mistake became only obvious when the fired card that clearly missed that the base line was not caused.
If the call was correct, Pavliuchenkova 5-4 lead in the first set, but Judge Nico Helverth ruled instead, and the point should be reproduced, and the cardal takes place to win the game.
Cartal was eliminated in stage on the last 16 years in the entire club of England
Russian accused the official home bias official, saying, “Because local, I can say whatever you took the game from me.”
In the statement, the Vimbledon spokesman said, “It is now clear that the Live Elc system, which has been optimally radio, deactivated in the part of the Court server for one match of those who manage the system.
“At that time, there were three calls that did not pick up the Elc in the affected part of the court. Two of them called a chair of a judge, which was not aware that the system was deactivated.
“After the third, the judge’s chair stopped the game and consulted with a re-examination official. It was determined to be repped. The presiding judge followed the established process. We involved players.
Pavliuchenkova talked to Helverth after the game, and she said, “It was very confusing at the beginning because the ball looked very long.
“It was a very crucial moment in the match. I just thought that the chair judge could take the initiative. I didn’t see anything that was something that was something that was something that made it something.
Anastasia Pavliuchenkova is up to the fourth of the finals on Vimbledon
“I think we’re losing a little charm that we actually have human beings. As during counseling, we didn’t have boys with the ball. Just gets a little strange and somehow robot oriented.
“They are very good in giving fine and coding breaches. These are not missing because every time there are few things, they are just there on the lines and better calls.”
Error monitors complaints to the accuracy of a new technique
Cartal, who insisted that she didn’t know if the ball in or out, defended Helvert’s handling the situation.
“That situation is a rarity,” she said. “I don’t think it really happened. It’s hard happiness. What can you do? Sumpire tries in that situation. I think it said well.” I think that’s what the most beautiful way has been told. “
Pavliuchenkova regrouped well after the incident, saving the card line point and continues to look for 7-6 (3) 6-4 victory and place in the quarterfinals.
He asked how she would feel she lost, the 34-year-old was kidding: “I just would say I hate Wimbledon and never return here.”
The incident is huge embarrassing for Wimbledon, with organizers who have defended innovation in the middle of controversy due to removing line judges.
The leading leading two-time Jack Draper and Emma Radukan complained of the accuracy of the system, which is now widely used on tour, this week.
Emma Raducan asked the accuracy of the new system after the third round exit
After his defeat, Arina Sabalenka on Friday, said Sladukan, “It’s kind of disappointing, tournament here, that calls can be so wrong.”
Vimbledon spokesman added: “We still have full confidence in the accuracy of the ball tracking technology.
“Live system relies on eye operators, reviewing and technology to work in harmony. This did not happen human error and as a result, we fully reviewed its processes.”
Watch the ATP and VTA Tours – as well as now open in New York – live on Ski Sports 2025. years or a stream without a contract.
