Congress can block the AI ​​laws within five years. That’s what I mean.


Federal proposal that will ignore the country and government, starting to organize AI for the first five can enter law, as a megabill (at the open home of July 4.

Those who vote – including Sam Altman’s Sam Altman, named Luckey, and Marc Andressen A16z – Patchwork “The AI ​​AI Regulatory in the countries will get american innovation

Critics include most Democrats, many Republicans, CEO Dinio Amodei, a group of labor, nonprofits safety, and consumer rights advisors. They reminds that this decision will block the contents of the law that protects the AI ​​dangerous and effectively creating a powerful AI company to operate without supervision or responsibility.

On Friday, group of 17 Gurgernah the Republic of writing to the leader of the Senate John Thune, which has been advised to “Tap the light“Approach to AI regulations, Mike Johnson House Speaker Call for the” AI moratorium “to drawn from budget reconciliation bills, each AXIOSSee rankings-.

The provision is pressed into the bill, the current “Bill Beautiful Bill,” in May. First designed to prohibit America from “(implementing) law or rule regulatory (AI) model, (AI) model, (AI) model, or automated decision system” during decade.

However, on the weekend, Cruz and Senha Blackburn (R-Tn), who also has criticized the billing, agreed to accelerate the rest In the AI ​​regulations are based on the country to five years. The new language also attempts to relieve the law that overcomes the kid’s abuse of children, children’s online security, and the right to name, and the pictures are there. However, the amendment says that the law cannot place “unpaid or not setting” in the AI ​​system – The legal expert is not sure How can I affect the AI ​​law.

Size Like That Can Show A AI Commerce that has passed, such as California’s AB 2013That requires companies to open data used to practice AI systems, and the Elvis act of the Tennessee, which protects your musicians and creators from Ai-Council.

But it came to the moratorium that was far away for the example. General citizens have been compiling Database The legislation is associated with ai that can be affected by moratorium. The database states that many countries passed through the overlap overlap, which can easier to make a AI company for navigation “patchwork.” For example, Alabama, Arizona, California, Delaware, Montana, Texas has a criminal or making a cup bound to distribute the media that is made from AI means to influence elections.

AI moratorium also threatens some of the unreasonable safety bills to wait for the signature, including The New York New York ActThose who need a large environment throughout the country to publish the safety reports by under.

Earn moratorium into budget billing requires some creative maneuver. Because the provisions of the budget bill should have a fiscal impression, Cruz fix the proposal in June to fulfill AI funding to receive a $ 42 billion funding (bead) funding.

Cruz Release Another revision Last week, who said the relationship only for $ 500 million beat funds included in the bill – a separate pot of money. However, the inspection close to the language that has been transformed the language may be threatening to pull broadband funds that have been obligated from the country not subject to.

Maria Cantwell (D-wa) before criticized Cruz reconciliation languages, claiming to provide “forces of the state of receiving bead financing to choose between big broadband or protecting consumers for ten years.”

What’s next?

Sam Altman, Co-founder and CEO Operanai, speak at Berlin on February 7, 2025. Altman says she predicts intelligence in the next two years.Credit File:Sean Gallup / Getty Pictures

When Monday, the Senate is involved in the sound-fat – the sound series rapidly in full Amendment Slations. The new language of the Cruz and Blackburn agrees will be put on broader amendments, whether the republicans are desired will be able to enter the party. Senator will also choose the Democratic formed Amendment to print all parts, the source that has known to tell techcrroch.

Chris Slees, Global Head Global Officer In Opening, said in a Send Link Sure “the patchwork approach is currently to arrange AI unable to be used and will continue to be dangerous if we stay on this road.” They say that this will be “serious implications” to the US as the race to establish ai dominance in China.

“When nobody usually, I usually know, anyone I have to say will determine the direction of this world,” wrote.

Opening CEO Sam Altman showed the same sentiment last week during Direct recording From the podcast podcast fork. He said when he believed some adaptive regulations that reached the biggest existential risk in AI would be good, “said the state of the country might be a real and difficult messing service.”

Altman also asked whether the company opened to handle the management AI when the technology moved quickly.

“I’m worried that … we kick three years to write about a very detailed and covering several cases, the technology will only be too fast,” said.

But it looks closer to the law of state that is a different story. Most of the state of the country are now not too far away; He focuses on protecting consumers and individuals from specialty, like deepfakes, frauds, discriminators, and privacy violations. She targets AI in context like rent, home, credit, health, and election, and includes protected policies.

TechCrunch has asked and other opening team members if they can name the current state law that removes the technology giant capabilities to advance for technology and release new models. We also asked why navigating a different state of state will be a very complex, to provide an overall progress in technology that can contondize some existing collar projects in the future.

TechCrunch asked Meta, Google, Amazon, and Apple, but did not receive answers.

Case to preemption

Dario Amodei
Dario AmodeiCredit File:Maxwell Zoff / TechCrunch

“Patchwork Arguments are something that has been heard from the beginning of the era of the Advocation consumer,” the company director of the company, the power of the Internet Kraket activities in TechCrunch Group. “But the fact is that the company is subject to different state regulations all the time. The most powerful company in the world? Yes, you can.”

The opponents and Cynics they say AI moratorium is not about innovation – estimated the sidestepping supervision. While many countries pass the law in AI, Congress, moving gently, graduated Zero laws AI.

“If the Federal government wants to pass a strong Safety Legal, and then Nathan Calvin,” said anything, and any capability, to force AI company came to the tableplatee. “

One of the critics loudly regarding the proposal is the CEO Singhropic CEO. In an My opinion For the New York Times, Amodei says “a 10-year moratorium is more funny.”

“AI is taking care of the rush,” he writes. “I believe that the system can change the world, in the first two years; in 10 years, all the bet is to die. Without a national policy.”

He argued that the company was to release the company, the government had to work with a AI company to make a transparent standard to make a company information about practice and model model.

Opposition is not limited to the democrats. There are opposition to a AI moratorium from the Republicans who protect the provision of the stomps in traditional GOP support for the senses’, although it is made by the famous Republicans like Cruz and Rep. Jay Oernolte.

The Republican Critic includes a cent. Josh Hawley (R-Mo), who is concerned about the rights of the country and to work on democrats to kick out of the bill. Blackburn also criticizing the provision, arguments should be reserved and creative industries from AI dangerous. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga)

What are the Americans doing?

The leader of the Republicans like Cruz and Senate Major John John said she wanted a “Touch light” approach the governance AI. Cruz also said the a statement If “every American deserves a sound in forming” the future.

However, late Research Pew Survey finds that most Americans look more about AI. Survey finds that about 60% of the adults and 56% of the more concern that the US government will not be able to include AI than the government will be too far. America is also unsure that the government will arrange AI effectively, and they celebrate the industry efforts of AI responsibility.

This article is updated June 30 to reflect the modus for the bill, reporting new to the Senate time to choose the bill, and the recent readup of Republicans to AI moratorium.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *