Try BBC

Since the US Donald Trump president ordered Iranian nuclear facilities by the end of the week, the Democrats as well as legal parties asked his legal authority to do so.
Republican Congressman Thomas Massie told X that strikes “not constitutional”, and another Republican congressman Warrenson wrote “hard to think of a competent constitution”.
But the Republican Speaker at the House Johnson is protected by the President, saying that “examines the approaching military actions to do for Congress who has military actions to work under the presidents of the two parties”.
The BBC targets the requests of legal experts when Trump’s actions are consistent with the Constitution or if he or she should consult with Congress.
What does the Constitution say about military action?
There are two parts of the US Constitution related here: Article I and Article II.
Article specifically lists the ability “to express war” as one of the powers of Congress.
However, Article II – revealing the powers of the President – saying “The President can command the chief of the army”, and BBC sources they see it as justice in Iranian strikes.
The Constitution experts say Article II gave the President of the authority to use military force in certain circumstances.
Conditions are not specifically positioned in the constitution – but then it is translated to include “actual or expected attack” or “advance in other important national interests,” according to Council Experts for High-Happiness.
These interests can include control of nuclear descent – saying Trump administration is their reason to attack Iran.
Four Constitutional Experts BBC insured Trump has an authority under conditions to order military strikes.
“The short answer is yes, he has an authority here,” says Claire Finkelstein, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. “There is a high behavior of Presidents involved in remote military measures without allowing Congress.”

Another expert in the Constitution law, Jessica Leviinson at Loyola Marymount University, said the President had limited air authority authority, and there was no obvious meaning to when it would happen “.
However Andrew Rudalevige, a professor of government at Betdoin, told the BBC without believing that the most recent strikes are not “a sudden attack of rejection”.
Although I have given Congress in the power to express war, the provision is rarely available.
The last time driven out of this power in 1942 after Japan bombed the Harbor in the pearl of Second World War. Before this point used on 10 occasions from 1812.
And experts also said that Presidents used their authority to order military actions that did not get approval from Congress more commonly.
John Bellinger, a legal counselor in the White House under President George George George, said: “In the past few decades without military consent without consent of Congress.”
“Congress and the courts are effectively subject to the requirement of a statement,” Jonathan Turley, a conservative constitutional constitutional expert, vpife told.
What did other presidents have done?
President Barack Obama authorized Libya Airstrike with no appeal from Congress, who was justified in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan Pakistan Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan in Pakistan Pakistan in 2011.
And during Trump’s first term, he Iranian murder to Iranian military officer of Qasem Soleimani without the consent of Congress.
Democrat Bill Bill Clinton launched balkans strikes in the 1990s without approval, and more did Joe Biden’s revival HOUTHI TARGHI IN YEMEN as well as Syria during his presidency.

“This authority is often used by Presidents of the whole history,” says Mr. Turley. “History and preliminary in favor of Trump in this action.”
The speaker Johnson began examples of previous Trump protection administrations, saying: “Presidents of both parties operate with the same commander in the II president.”
“President Obama rode eight months of bombing campaigns there. I never heard a democratic balk about anyone, and suddenly, now, it’s up to the weapon.”
What about other laws?
Critics of Trump’s strikes also taught the war resolution passed in 1973 with the war in Vietnam to limit warfare without consulting with Congress first.
Although the law permits the President to use force without consultation with Congress in emergencies, it says they should consult with Congress before introducing the armed forces in the United States “.
“President Trump is not found to follow this requirement,” Mr Bellinger said. “Based on reporting so far, it appears that President Trump has never had many Congress consultants, but how many Republican leaders have been announced.”
Media Media reported The democratic senate minority leader Chuck Schumer called about an hour before the strikes began but given little detail.
The Secretary of White House Press Karoline Leavitt wrote X That the administration made “Bipartisan courtesy calls Congress leadership” and talk to Senator Schumer at first strikes.
The resolution also said that Congress should be informed within 48 hours after the military action has occurred.
The Secretary of Defense Hegseth said followed by Iran attacks that Congress “announced after a series of safe” and that they “followed the necessary battle powers”.
