The United States bombed on Sunday morning Three Iranian molecules sites After more than a week of Israeli on Tehran’s military and nuclear site, Stokeing Concern Radiation leakage and contamination in Iran and neighboring countries in this region.
US President Donald Trump said that the United States has attacked important nuclear conservation facilities in Fordo, Natanz and Isfhan. Until now, no increase in radiation levels outside the targeted site has been found.
But the UN Nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), has warned of chemical contamination in these facilities. And experts say that only Iran’s operating nuclear power project, any attack on bushur can lead to a major radiation crisis.
Here is what you know about radiation risk and potential for radiation in Iran and region:
What do we know about the Israeli attack on the Fordo site?
According to a spokesman for the QOM province’s crisis management headquarters, the Israeli army attacked Iran’s Ford Nuclear site a day after the Israeli army targeted the US attacks.
Mortza Hedari did not give further information about the attack, but said “there is no danger to the citizens” in that area.
Trump claimed the “monument damage” of nuclear sites after attacking three nuclear sites, including Fordo. “It is an exact word to destroy it!” He posted on his true social platform.
On Monday, IAEA chief Rafael Groosi said the “very important loss” at the Fordo site was expected. “No one is in a position to fully evaluate the underground damage in Fordo with IAEA,” he said that it would be “very important”.
“It is due to the” use of explosive pelod and the extremely vibrant-sensitive nature of the Centrifuges “, said Grosi at an emergency meeting of the Governor’s Board of IAEA.
Does the United States are contaminated with radiation?
After the Sunday attacks, the level of radioactivity in Iran and nearby countries is common, their government and IAEA were confirmed, which states that off-site radiation has not been reported.
In a statement on Sunday, the IAA said that the Isfahan site, which had also been hit by Israel before Israel, has suffered additional damage even after the US attack.
The IAEA said that any radiation contamination arising at Isfhan is limited to damaged or destroyed buildings.
“There is no number of nuclear materials or natural or low-rich uranium, which means that any radiation contamination is limited to damaged or destroyed buildings,” the agency said.
IAEA Chief Groosi said that the US end of the United States hit many buildings, some “related to the uranium conversion process” and the fuel conservation project in Natanz.
Groce said that the IAA inspector is ready to check the targeted facilities when “agreed with Iran.”
According to the UN’s website, IAEA examines and reports Iran’s nuclear activity through Iran’s inspection, supervision equipment, environmental sample and satellite images.
Why the radiation remained at the normal level?
There are several possible reasons why radiation remained at normal levels.
One is that Iran had removed its nuclear infrastructure in the hope of the previous Israeli strike. Mahadi Mohammadi, a consultant to Iran’s Parliament President Mohammad Bagal Galibaf, said that Iran had shifted the nuclear infrastructure from Ford to expect the attack.
Until now, only the conservation site, where the uranium is rich in molecules, has been hit.
At the conservation site, uranium exists in the form of gas, which combines with fluoride gas that produces uranium hexopheroid. To increase the ratio of uranium -235, it has revolved into centrifuges, the concentration of the nuclear fragmentation chain reaction.
Therefore, if the beating is done, the uranium hexophyllide may leave the site of prosperity. After inhale, fluoride gas is deadly and the skin may be corrupted.
In addition, conservation facilities are also underground and hundreds of meters deep are buried, which makes them difficult to damage and therefore reduce radiation risk.
On the other hand, separate nuclear reactors are mainly used by uranium. In the separated reactor, the reaction of the dissolution chain must be within a second degree, causing a huge amount of energy explosion. In short, 90 percent of the richness is required to make nuclear bombs.
Why are experts warning from attacking the bushr plant?
The IAEA’s main warning has expressed concern over the attacks on the Bushr nuclear space, warning of a disaster if the plant at Gulf Coast in Iran is hit.
Large Said On Thursday, Ki Busher was hit directly, on which the IAEA is examined, which will result in the “high release of radioactivity to the environment.”
Grocery added that Bush has a “thousands of kilograms of nuclear content”. In the worst case, it is necessary to issue an order to vacate the area for several hundred kilometers of this plant with population centers in other Gulf countries, he said.
The IAEA chief said that the power supply to Busher could cause the reactor to melt the nuclear core and have serious consequences.
Officers need protective actions, including administering iodine and possibly restricting food supply, is several hundred kilometers away with subsequent radiation monitoring.
On June 2 June, the Israeli army said that he was attacked by Bushr, but later he said that the announcement was a mistake.
750 km south of Tehran. (465 miles) is about 750 km (465 miles) Bushr Iran’s only professional nuclear power plant. It is run by uranium created in Russia.
Busher, about 223,504 people, has two large nuclear reactors – one of them is still under construction.
Former IAA inspector Robert Kelly, a former IAA inspector working in South Africa and Libya in Iraq, said Al Jaizira, said, “It would be very dangerous if the bomb has been hit or the cooling systems are interrupted.”
Kelly said, “You will have an accident on the scale of Fukushima, where the nuclear will melt inside his building and maybe a little gas in the atmosphere.”
On March 7, Fukushima Dai at the east coast of Japan was disabled by three nuclear earthquakes and Tsunami’s earthquake and Tsunami in the nuclear power plant at Okuma. The radioactive material was released from the site, which was evacuated by thousands of people.
The UN report considers Fukushima in Chernobil in Ukraine in 1986.
“If anyone attacks the city of Bushr, it cannot be a reactor. So when people are saying that they are attacking Bushr or attacking Bushr’s nuclear reactor, they are not yet gone,” said Kelly.
“I think the Somone who has already attacked the facility they created and the Russian people have a lot to say about the price of about $ 7 billion.
Russian State News Agency RIA reported that Russia’s nuclear power corporation Rosatom, Alexei Likchev, warned: “If the operational first power unit ends, it would be a disaster compared to Chernobil.”
Why are the Gulf states worried?
The termination of the bushr will contaminate the serious source of dacilated to the Gulf countries, including Qatar.
Catar and Baharen rely on the desalinated water for drinking water. All the groundwater of Baharan has been saved for accidental schemes.
Qatar’s Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed Bin Abdullah Bin Jasim Al Thani in March said Qatar imitated the attack on Bushr in an interview to the US media personality Takar Carlson. The Qatar Prime Minister revealed that the gulf will be completely contaminated by the attack on the plant and the Qatar would “get out of the water within three days”.
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) depends on the desalineed water, which is more than 80 percent of the drinking water.
In Saudi Arabia, about percent of the pension water supply has come from Deselinated water till 223, the general authority of the statistics said.
Countries like Saudi Arabia, UAE and Oman have access to other water sources, while Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait have no other options.
Kelly said the nuclear reactors are extremely difficult and are designed to melt in their containers in a particular accident.
He said, “The idea that much of the inside of the inside is going to come out is actually too small, so I think people are probably getting worse,” he said.
“Granted, if they go to the Gulf, they will be in the water that follows people. It is a very large body of water that will reduce any material to go there. I think this is a great problem.”
