Security Security Security

Iran is sorry for the night airstrike in its three nuclear sites, promised what it called “endless”.
But beyond words, there are fever discussions that are happening at the highest level of Iranian security security.
Should they increase the conflict by retaliation against the interests of the US, or, as the US talked with Donald Trump to do, which in practice means to give up all nuclear development of Iran?
This internal debate occurs at a time when many senior Iranian commanders will look at their shoulders, wondering if they can be a precision in Israel, the overseas spy in Israel.
Wide speech, there are three different strategic courses of action that is currently open to Iran. None of the no-risk free, and more than the thoughts of those who discuss the decisions of the Islaimic Republic regime.
Change Hard and Soon
Many will pay for blood. Iran, first of Israel first, now what is always called ‘The Great Satan’, its term for the US.
The continuing exchange of Irania’s fire in Israel continued on tenths but retaliation against the US brought a new level of risk, not only for Iran but for the whole region.
Iran is believed to remain about half of its original stock of 3,000 missiles, used and lost the rest of the Israeli fire exchanges.
Iran has a target list of about 20 US bases to choose from the wider Middle East.
One of the nearest and most obvious is the raging headquarters of the US Navy’s strength fleet in Bahrain’s Mina Salman. But Iran can hesitate to strike a neighboring Gulf Arab State. Perhaps, it may be used for its proxies in Iraq and Syria to attack any of a relatively remote US bases in Tan-Tanf, ain al-asad or Erbil. Iran has a shape here.
When Trump directed the killing of Quds Force Leader in Iran Qassim Soleimani in 2020, Iran responded by targeting Iraq military personnel but avoided killing anyone by providing the first notice. This is not possible thereby at this time.

Iran can also launch attacks on US attacks on the drones and torpedo ships, something revolutionary guards have taken for many years.
The goal, if it goes down on this route, is to heal US Naval Defense by the numbers of Lip. It can also ask its allies in Yemen, the Houthis, to keep their attacks on Western Shipping in the middle of India and in the Red Sea.
There are also economic targets that can strike Iran, but it will anticipate the neighbors of the Arab who have just reached an unknown modus Vivendi with the Republic of Islamic.
The biggest and most harmful target here will choke the important rigid hormuz, where over 20 percent of the world’s oil supplies each day. Iran can do it by sowing sea mines, creating a fatal risk for naval and commercial shippings.
Then have cyber. Iran, with North Korea, Russia and China, have a sophisticated annoying cyber capability. Inserting harmful malware in US networks or businesses undoubtedly is an option considered.

Again later
This means wait until the current tension has quit and launched a surprise attack at a time of choice Iran, if Iran’s bases are no longer at the maximum alert.
Such attacks can also target US diplomatic, consular or trade missions, or continue killing individuals. Of course, the risk here for Iran, so the US attacks are likely to attract more like ordinary Iranians to return to normal life.
Don’t take revenge
It will get a lot of control over Iran but it can save it from further US attack. The route can still be selected in the diplomatic and the US negotiations, even if the foreign minister of Iran is focusing that Iran has never left negotiations, with his words, in his words, and the US breaking them.
But restart negotiations with US-Iran in Muscat, Rome or wherever to do if Iran is ready to receive the red line pressed by the US and Israel. That is for Iran to continue the civil nuclear program, it should be sent to all Uranium abroad for developing.
Doing any after taking such a batter that also makes the Iranian regime weak, especially after all the warnings of frightening references if the US attacks. Finally may decide that the risk of weakening its population is more than the cost of any additional US attack.