The law complains to expose the ‘extremely sensitive and controversial speech’ to expose the ‘extremely sensitive and controversial speech’ protected under the first amendment of the US constitution.
The X Corporation of Elon Musk has filed a claim against New York State Attorney General Latia James. Challenging the law in the US state, social media companies need to disclose how to examine hate speech, extremism and other materials.
The complaint filed by the Manhattan Federal Court on Tuesday argues that law companies have forced to disclose the protected “extremely sensitive and controversial speech” under the first amendment of the United States, but the state has disagreed.
Went in December 2024, Social media companies in the law must clearly clarify their service terms and submit reports on those terms to the Attorney Turney General.
“We are boldly taking action to hold companies responsible, strengthen protection, and to provide transparency and security to customers.”
The X Corporation is looking for a court order to prevent the enforcement of the law, which is known as the Hate Act to hide the stop.
Deciding what material is acceptable on the social media platform, “Razi’s significant debate about where to draw a line of proper saying” increases significant debate among the people, “X said,” The government cannot play this role “.
In this complaint, the letter of the two MLAs, which is sponsored by the law, also states that X and musk are “annoying records” about the control of the contents of the contents of “our democracy are dangerous”.
According to New York law, social media companies must reveal the steps they take to eliminate hatred on their platforms and report their progress. Civil penalties for daily violations can reach $ 15,000.
The law was written by Brad Holleman-Sigal and Assembly member Grace Lee, both Democrats.
A series of cases
X said New York made its law based on the law of almost the same 2023 California, which was partially blocked by the Federal Appeal Court in September because of the concern of free speech.
California agreed in February Settlement with X to not apply the revelation requirement of the law.
It marks the latest in a series of company cases. In April, X filed a lawsuit for the law banned on Deepfek for the purpose of harming political candidates or affecting the elections to the state of Minnesota.
Kasturi has described himself as a free speech as meaningless, but he has also been criticized for censor on political voice that he does not agree. As aEl Jazir reported beyond 2024 In the presidential election, Donald Trump’s then talkative supporters, Kasturi regularly suppressed democratic voices and suspended several accounts on X -Trump or Kasturi’s thoughts.
Kasturi’s leadership also continues on the platform to increase hate speech. In 2023, In the center to resist the digital hat it found that the failure to work on X99 A percentage of materials filled with hate posted by users who have subscribed to the company’s premium service Twitter Blue.
Watchtog groups reports with media matters eventually pause advertisements on many major brands platforms, leading to Ax’s response to lawsuits.
